August 13, 2010

Mac vs PC - Pros & Cons Comparison Review

comparison unbiased review - pc vs mac

In this unbiased comparison review, I want to address both Pros and Cons of both PC and Mac computers. I am a PC user. As a PC user, I was very interested to know about the Apple Mac computer Photo Editing experience work-flow. I must admit that after reading some hundreds "Mac vs PC" articles and forums threads, I still didn't get an answer, should I?

Well, Mac and PC computers are rivals back from the old days, where Steve Jobs (Apple) and Bill Gates (Microsoft) where... what can I say.. friends?. However, instead of digging deep into the past, I want to concentrate on what we have now, and how Mac computers compete against PC computers in terms of photo editing RAW power, software availability and user experience. I personally know many photographers who will not give up their Mac computers (iMac or MacBook Pro) for anything but a new Mac computer. As a photography tool, computers help us shorten our workflow process and give us many tools to achieve out final goals.


There are also many photographers who use a PC computer for daily photo editing jobs, and they are more than happy with their hardware equipment. Whether you should buy a Mac or a PC, is a question that is very hard to answer, because it has many answers that will probably lead you to a dead end. So in this "Is Mac right for me?" or "Mac vs PC" blog post, I want to address some of the pros and cons, concerns, facts and opinions, that both Mac and PC users/photographers have been arguing about. Let's see if I can find the final answer - Buy a Mac or  a PC for photo editing workflow and what are the cons and pros for each one and one of them.

Photo Editing Software


Both Mac and PC have a wide variety of hardware configurations. However, before jumping to that section, let's see what photo editing (graphics) software are available for Mac OS X (Leopard), compared to those you can find for Microsoft Windows operating system. Photo editing software is the main tools that photographers use to manipulate their digital images. Both professional and amateur photographers, use photo editing software to satisfy their creativity needs and deliver the right end product to their clients. There are both professional photo editing software and tools, as well as simpler and affordable ones for hobbyist photographers. The differences between them vary, depends on the usage and needs for every photographer as an individual. Some you can find on both Mac and PC, and some are just for a specific platform.

Mac
iMac icon
Mac has a large arsenal of photo editing software for Max OS X, which anyone can find its own solution that fits its own budget and photo editing workflow needs. If you are searching for free photo editors for Macintosh, you should probably take a look at The GIMP, Seashore, Pixen, Apple's iPhoto (comes as part of iLife with Max OS X Snow Leopard) and many others. Most of them are Open Source, and can be a great solution for amateur photographers, who are searching to download a free Mac OS X photo editing software.

However, the main reason photographers buy a Mac computer, is to take advantage of professional photo editing software & tools, that most of them are not free. Professional photographers will choose Adobe Photoshop CS5 for their digital imaging needs. There are cheaper solutions like Adobe Photoshop Elements, which is an affordable photo editing software that makes editing pictures a snap. You can also find paid Mac photo editing software like Pixelmator, Acorn, Aurora, PhotoStudio, LightZone, Compositor and of course, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom and Aperture 3, are  probably the most popular  (paid) photo editing software among Mac photographers and designers.

PC
PC computer icon

Almost every photo editing software that you can find on a Mac, you can find on a PC. That includes Adobe Photoshop CS5 and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom for professional photo editing workflow. Although that some of the free open source software are for Mac only,  you can't ignore the large collection of free photo editing software for the Windows OS too.



Conclusion: Mac: 1, PC: 1

If it's a pro photo editing software, plugin, image noise reduction tool or an image viewer, both PC and Mac computers have a wide variety of solution that will feet everyone. The main advantage that the Mac has over a PC, is that it comes bundles (for free) with iLife. It means that out of the box, hobbyist photographers and designers can enjoy more advanced tools right away. If you are a Microsoft windows user, you probably know that PC built in photo editing software is... what I can say... just bad. Apple has given much thought about user experience design, and in terms user-friendliness, user experience design & straight out-of-the-box availability, I would give the Mac 1 point. PC gets one point also, because in reality, I think that they are comparable int terms of photo editing software availability.

Hardware Configuration

computer's hard-drive and a magnifying glass over it

Probably, one of the most valuable decisions are based on the computer configuration. The better specs, the faster the results. When it comes to 2D usage, you won't see a great advantage between some close computer configurations, as if you compare it with 3D software. One of the most valuable parts of the computer for photo editing tasks is the CPU. Nevertheless, in order to take advantage of current multi-threaded apps & multi-tasking needs, you will probably need more RAM and a good graphics video card to speed things up. Comparing Mac and PC computers one against the not a smart thing to do. There are not black-boxes, and every one of them can be upgraded according to your specific tasks needs.

So it usually ends up with the cost of a equivalent hardware specs. In many PC vc Mac Multi-Core CPU benchmarks. Today you can buy a Mac with Quad Cores (i5 and i7 Intel CPUs), 8-Cores and Even 12 Cores with the Mac Pro, You can get more horse power if you just pay for it. But it is not just about CPUs, but also about the screen and hardware architecture.

Mac
iMac icon

Mac vs. PC hardware benchmarks are everywhere. You can find many YouTube videos of Mac users that compare their Mac computers (iMac, Mac Pro and MacBook Pro) against PCs computers.  Take a look at this video for comparison:

Mac vs. Pc - iMac 2.8 i7 Benchmarks and Tour




This guy on the video has used Geekbench benchmarking software to accurately measure processor and memory performance of its Apple iMac against top leading PC hardware benchmark scores. Seems pretty impressive, isn't it?

One thing that is probably worth mentioning. Apple developed Mac's operating system and has a very close inspection on most of the hardware manufacturing process. Part of the hardware is made by apple and other parts are made by third party manufacturers. They utilize the 64bit power in every Mac OS X software, optimizing the performance and code too. Because they have a control on both manufacturing processes, they can better optimize the code for specific software design, take advantage of the 64bit architecture and Multicore supported apps, to elevate software performance.

Also, According to Wikipedia: "Apple directly sub-contracts hardware production to Asian original equipment manufacturers such as Asus, maintaining a high degree of control over the end product" (source: Wikipedia). Thanks for commenting about that.


PC
PC computer icon
Many of you have PC computers, both laptops and desktop computers. The main advantage of PC computers when compared to a Mac computer, is that you can custom built your own dream machine.On Mac, customization is limited, There are branding solutions also from DELL, HP and other manufacturers too. Even so, it is easier to get a more affordable computer that exactly fits your needs, many photographers and designers choose the PC as an alternative for a Mac. The price is probably the biggest issue. Many people don't take their working hours into account. How many times have you spent in front of your computers, waiting for Photoshop finishing its filtering process? - You can ignore that time that the machine consumes in order to finish a specific task.

Yes, PC computers are more affordable. And you can build a fairly equivalent High-End Macintosh computer's configuration for less. With PC, you can choose from thousands of different graphics video cards, memory vendors, motherboards, latest CPUs technologies from AMD and Intel. It is a great advantage overall. Even so, it can also be a big disadvantage, depends how you look at it. Some hardware parts don't work well together. Because many computer parts are from different manufacturers, you must read the manufacturer compatibility list on their product's page, to see the official comparability test results. You may find that some memory cards won't work well on specific motherboards, for example.

For many people it can be a big headache and can cause problems later on. When you buy a iMac, Mac Pro or MacBook Pro computer, you get a well tested hardware equipment, that comes from a single manufacturer, Apple. Even happened that your computer power supply just died, the computer gets too hot, sudden shutdowns and restarts, failed motherboard? -- Well, this is the life of a PC user (at least for some).

I am a PC user, and I can tell you that I have personally had many problems with both laptops and desktop computers. This is an unbiased opinion as you can guess.

Conclusion: Mac: 1, PC: 0.5

0.5 score for PC and 1 for the Mac. PC has its own advantages of being comparably cheaper, but cheaper doesn't mean always good. You know the saying "You get what you paid for" (from Chinese, 一分钱一分货). In many cases, you will find out that it is a very smart saying. Other advantages of the PC include: more available custom parts & buy the latest hardware innovation instead of waiting for a company to adapt the technology and implement it. On the other side, Mac computers are built to last. They are all manufactured by Apple, optimized for optimal compatibility with other hardware parts and software. You won't need to read manuals, read comparability lists on various 3rd part companies' websites, you get a perfect & fully featured product, right out of the box. Apple has implemented the finest materials, that are optimal for long lasting hardware use, even for the most demanding needs and industrial usage.  On many PC vs. Apple Mac websites, I see that they give full one score only. In this section, the Mac is absolutely worth the extra 0.5 score.

All in all, with Mac computers you will get both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, DVD reader and burner, a cool wireless Magic mouse & Wireless keyboard that has the WOW-factor embedded on them. But if you want a new Blu-Ray burner drive, you will probably will need to wait another year or two. So you get the point.

More related stuff:

iMac vs Gateway One PC
Mac vs. PC cost analysis


Security


When it comes to Mac vs. PC security concerns, many experts think that Windows has caught up with Apple. Before Microsoft Windows 7, we have all heard that Windows operating system is a targeted platform for malicious attacks. Of course it is true, but the question is. Does the operating system has the right tools to defend it self? With Mac computers, you won't need to worry about viruses as you do in Windows operating system. The real problem is not only about viruses, but about security breaches that allow hackers to penetrate into your computer, and steel you valuable art works, photographs and important (and sometimes secret) media assets. It was proven that both Windows 7 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard have their own glitches. DailyTech.com posted an article, saying that one prominent Mac hacker has pointed out that Mac OS X Snow Leopard is less secured than Microsoft Windows 7 OS. Well, if a Celeb hacker says so, we should probably take it pretty seriously.

So it seems, at least when making a business decision, that you shouldn't pick a Macintosh over a PC, just because people are telling you that Macintosh doesn't have viruses, or they are more secure. Apple OS X Snow Leopard is based on the UNIX core. That fact alone doesn't make it more secure than Windows 7 as you can see. We just couldn't ignore the fact that viruses are real pane in the axx. As a power PC user, I am fad up with all those pop-out windows saying "You have been infected with a Virus...". I would probably be very happy knowing that I can work quietly, without worying about viruses and all that craxxx horrors that the Internet brings with it. You just can't blame Windows operating system for being more popular.

Conclusion: Mac: 1, PC: 0.5

Overall, I think that Mac deserves one point for the user experience. It is not PC fault that it is a more popular target compared to the Mac. But Microsoft Windows 7 has proved to be a more secured OS, and even if it has it own flaws that trouble users, it deserved a half point score in my opinion.

More related stuff:

Mac security news
Apple product security (on Apple's official website)
Microsoft online safety and Privacy Education (on Microsoft's official website)

Operating System

Operating system related tag cloud words

When it comes to comparing both Apple Mac OX X Snow Leopard and Microsoft Windows 7 head-to-head, I have my own opinion too. Both Max OS X and Windows are among the most popular OS available. Microsoft had its own pitfalls with Windows Vista, but was managed to correct its reputation when Microsoft introduces Windows 7. The operating system is the base for every software and designer workflow process. It needs to implement the best  user experience design offers. Today, many photographers and designers need a multitasking environment, while jumping from one application to the other. Technology has brought some significant improvements in terms of usability, speed, stability, security and the fun factor. More Multimedia applications are being developed and upgraded as we speek.

Both Microsoft Windows and Mac OS X offer a wide variety of tools for managing our digital assets. Whether we connect online or offline. Apple has the best user experience and designers team in the world. This fact alone, gives Apple a major advantage when compared to Microsoft. Some believe that Microsoft copies Apples ideas after every major upgrade. In reality, the most important factor will be how the operating system performs in terms:

  • Usability & Graphical user interface (UI)
  • speeding photographers and web designers workflow
  • Managing and organizing digital assets
  • Internet browsing experience
  • Hardware install ,configuration and compatibility
  • Performance
  • Security
  • Startup speed
  • Software availability
  • Updates & Upgrades
  • Ease-of-Use
  • Ease of application development
  • Networking - Wired and Wireless connectivity
As you can see, there is a lot to be done in order to satisfy both the consumer & professional user. So which one is the best, Apple OS X or Microsoft Windows?

Mac
iMac icon
Apple's Mac OS X Snow Leopard has proven to be  the most advanced operating system Apple's has ever released (not surprisingly, it's the latest version). Apple gives a lot of emphasize on usability, accessability, design and performance of its OS. I can personally understand why Apple has found itself in the heart of many artistic people and businesses. It is perfectly engineered and designed to provide the best of all worlds: Compatibility, Accessibility, Ease-of-Use, Performance & Security (well, we can argue about the security).

Apple implements many new technologies and enhancements in every major upgrade. Supporting 64-bit architecture for every software and application, supports Multiple Cores CPUs, optimized for photo & video editing software and much more. People just love the look and feel of Apple OS X Snow Leopard, it runs smoothly, has the best UI and it is very intelligent. Well, by meaning "Intelligent", I mean that Apple's engineers seems to understand how users want their operating system to behave. Managing tasks and digital assets are a snap. Everything seems perfectly combined together for the optimal user experience. I didn't hear people saying bad things about Apple's OS, but I have read & heard thousands of unsatisfied Microsoft Windows' customers.

The optimization for each major upgrade is noticeable, Even if you run the OS on same hardware, you will feel the differences between the two versions. It optimized to take advantages of every piece of hardware installed on its computers, and the results are nothing but astonishing!

Apple OS X enjoys its upgraded Expose and the superior Dock functionality. The Zoom slider, Stacks and Exchange support are all useful and welcome features.

PC
PC computer icon
Many of you know and experience the cons and pros of Microsoft Windows operating system. When VISTA came out, the WWW was tumbling and mumbling like a huge storm of unsatisfactory towards Microsoft. However, we are looking at the present and not the past. When Microsoft introduced Windows 7 (even before that, at the beat stage), things just seem to get along much better. Windows 7 is a much better OS in my opinion, more stable, secured and easy to use. It is not a major upgrade of course, but as many people say: "Windows 7 is what VISTA was supposed to be...".

I am currently working on Windows 7, and as a power-user, I must admit that I am very satisfied with the end product. I have also had a chance to try out OS X many times. In terms of business applications, I think that Microsoft has the upper hand. But the operating system is much pricier than Apple's Snow Leopard, costs around $600 compared to $29 for the OS X.

There are many businesses that choose Microsoft Windows and buy a PC computer, because there are special business software that are Windows-only. It is a debate of course. When Apple introduced native version of Microsoft Office and Microsoft Exchange server support, it has shrunk this gap.

Running Windows 7 on Snow Leopard
Personally, and I think that many of you will agree, that both PC and Mac have great OS. I think that it is just a matter of what you are used to. Apple tries to convince PC guys to switch to Mac, and they are doing it because they know that many people are just used to working with Microsoft Windows OS. But there is a second part for this story. Any Mac user, whether using a Mac Mini, MacBook Pro Mac Pro or iMac, can install and seamlessly integrate Windows 7 operating system with OS X. You can use VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop 5, CodeWeavers CrossOver Mac or Apple's Boot Camp. So for are asking: "Can I run Microsoft Windows 7 on my Mac computer?", I say: "YES, You Can!". Oh, let's not forget that there are some options to run OS X on Windows 7 as well (see Hackintosh.com).

Here is a Mac Vs. PC: Windows 7 Vs. Snow Leopard video, that I think that you find interesting:


It seems that this guy (Lack78) is very convincing, so should you switch to Mac from PC or not?
Did you know that 85% of Macintosh users in America also owns a PC? - Really?

Conclusion: Mac: 1, PC: 1

I think there is no real reason to prefer on over the other. Both are great OS and has cons and pros. So I give one point for each one of them. Some say that the OS X has the WOW-factor, while the Windows 7 doesn't. With both you will be very productive.  So if you are a designer who search for the ultimate OS for photo editing jobs, both offer a great base for installing your favorite photo editing software and work without a problem.

Product Design


In terms of product design, Apple has certainly has the upper hand. It does that every time it introduces a new product like the iPhone, iPad, iMac,PowerBook G4, MacBook Pro, iPod, etc. We must give a big credit to Jonathan Ive, Senior Vice President, Industrial DesignApple. Jonathan "Jony" Paul Ive has done wonders to Apple's product from the first day he landed its feet at Apple. I would be surprised that someone will argue about that, even though everyone has its own opinion about what is Beautiful and what is not. There are some nice PCs out there, and you can greatly customize them too. In my opinion, Apple wins the crown in terms of product design, Thumbs Up!!

Full 1 point for Apple for that.


Conclusion: Mac: 1, PC: 0


Marketing

No body will argue that Apple is the kind of viral marketing. You might find some PC ads/commercials on local magazines and newspapers, but you will not find great "Mac vs PC" / "Get a Mac" / "Buy a Mac" / "Hello, I am a Mac, and I am a PC" commercials like Apple produces.

Here is collection of 15 "Buy a Mac" ads:



Well, there is not reason to give Mac a score for that, it was just for pure fun!

Final Verdict - Mac Wins (5-3)!


It seems that we have a winner here, and it is the Mac. In the real world though, I think that both computers have their cons and pros. For designers who search for the ultimate machine for photo editing software, I think that both PC and Mac will serve you well. Nevertheless, Mac seems to be a more friendly, virus free, stable & highly optimized for performance. It has the design WOW factor that many designers and creative people will just love to put on the work, at work or at home.

With Mac, you won't need to worry about hardware comparability issues & malicious codes that run on your computer. It is a proven product that found  itself on the desk of many designers and photographers, and for a reason! (actually, many reasons).

Mac computers cost more, that's a fact. But if you take all the variables into consideration and Crumple them into time saving and effectiveness, I think that you will find Mac computers to be very friendly & affordable  computers overall, better than a PC computer. Again, I am a PC user, and this is my final verdict about the never ending discussion "Which one is Better? - PC or Mac". Hope you find this article interesting. If you do, please share it.

I will update this review from time to time, to better reflect the advantages and disadvantages between the two platforms (the score too).

Idan.


45 comments:

  1. Very thoughtful analysis.

    I am replacing my 5 year old XP PC and have been leaning toward an iMac, having just replaced my notebook with a MacBook Pro. My most important application is photo editing, so the focus of your article is highly relevant to me.

    I have read a lot of bigotry back and forth on the Mac v. PC topic. Your analysis was the most objective and nicely structured I have read. You gave me comfort to proceed with my preferred option.

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment. Think of this that way, most of the dedicated computer-based industrial products, use specific hardware that were designed especially for a specific purpose. I honestly think that Apple is one of those companies that build their products very close to that standard. This is why Macintosh computers are more tolerant for hardware failures and are known to be very reliable.

    Yes, the price is higher, but you are paying for high-grade interior and exterior components. For example, Apple utilizes high quality metal cases for its MacBook Pro laptop computers for better heat dispensation. Furthermore, Apple uses high-grade IPS panels for their iMac and MacBook Pro computers, rather than cheap TN panels. You get 16M accurate color projection, which are crucial for photo editing work.

    Of course, many people just can't appreciate that because lack of technological knowledge. I have a 18.4" HP PC laptop computer, which uses a TN panel. Believe me, the difference is unbelievable. If you compare two photos, one on a TN panel and one on a IPS panel, you will probably be very surprised with the outcome.

    Apple doesn't get into too much details, explaining about every piece of hardware and architecture (most of us won't understand that). Also, There is not need for that, because its main target is to deliver results.

    That means a stable OS with the best user experience, long lasting high-quality hardware parts for maximum performance and reliability. People don't appreciate things, until something fails and they need to fix it & pay for it.

    I think I will write a second comparison article that will give more emphasize on the hardware itself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you all for your interesting comments. I began with the original Macintosh in the early 80's at home. Eventually I found myself in a corporate career path that used PC's exclusively and had to learn how to use them.

    Now I am craving the capabilities that I hear are within Apple computers I too am a photographer, but I also do a fare amount of word documents, PowerPoints and Excel. From what I have seen at the Apple store, those applications are nearly the same as on the PC.

    Can anyone tell me how they felt about switching over to Apple regarding the mouse, and different control keys and search mechanisms? It feels awkward to me when I play with them in the store. Does it take long to get used to?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it boils down to preference and popularity. I've used PCs for a while, but spent about 8 months researching and toying with Macs to see if I could switch. When it boiled down to it, I use far too many Windows apps I've come well accustomed to that I cannot use on the Mac. As far as viruses and worms: get informed. There are many vulnerabilities that come out in the Linux kernel (Mac OS X runs on a flavor of it). If it were a Linux world, you'd hear much more about viruses in Linux than Windows. Why exploit the minority of computer owners?

    ReplyDelete
  5. OS X is based off UNIX, not Linux (Linux itself is based on UNIX). The differences are too numerous to mention here, but the camps share on commonality - you have to personally authorize programs to execute.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have corrected it. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. hi, for photographers one additional questions should be answered: how important is color accuracy for your work? Apple does not seem to pay much attention anymore to their screens product line. All iMacs come with glossy screens and so is the new Cinema Display that will replace the 30" and 24" display. All glossy only. Glossy computers are great to review pictures on screen, but I guess they are not useful if you want or need to produce pictures for other purposes i.e. print publishing. it seems very difficult to get proper color profiles or to calibrate its screens.

    In our local Apple store, an expert (suprisingly) admitted he would not buy a Apple anymore if he'd be a photographer due to its screen design ...

    Sure you can use a MacPro or iMac and a third party screens (such as an Eizo) but than the design wow-effect has gone ... and that is what you pay the extra for in the end ;-). And i7, i5 are still pretty much the same in a Mac or a PC setup.

    Anybody got any experience with the screens?

    Guido/Switzerland

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have to agree with you there, regarding the glossy screen. When it comes to color accuracy, Eizo use IPS panels too. The ColorEdge CG301W is an amazing 30" screen, with 2560 x 1600 native resolution, which comes with hardware calibration. Furthermore, it reproduces 97% of the Adobe RGB color space. When it comes to professional photo editing for series work (ex. print publishing that you have mentioned), I honestly think that the "WOW" factor is not that important, the final results are.

    But there are many photographers that are more than happy with the results, which the iMac delivers. Furthermore, I think that in a well-lit room, without strong reflections, you can even work with a glossy screen and get good results. But if I wanted the best.. I would have chosen an EIZO display.

    Thanks for sharing you thoughts.
    Idan.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "unbiased comparison review"

    Yeah, um, no. Especially on the issue of hardware. You are simply wrong. In fact every time you found a difference it was in favor of Mac. On security I agreed with your analysis, Mac being less of a target will benefit some Mac users. However, on the point of hardware you demonstrate your bias by claiming that Mac hardware is superior to PC hardware. It is definitely NOT! I have a 5 year old Dell PC that has hardware that outlasts and outperforms all but the very NEWEST of the Macs. You claim they use the "finest" hardware, but you are VERY wrong. They make deals with China manufacturers just like everyone else. Marketing has nothing at all to do with this comparison. Then, very suspect, you leave out all of the areas that PCs shine, like expandability, flexibility, compatibility. Macs are notoriously proprietary even between other Macs... You're a fanboy in disguise, and if you had not claimed to be unbiased this opinion article would not be offensive, but because you lied in hopes of enhancing Mac's marketing influence you frankly represent what's wrong with the world in general. Lots of lying people trying to coerce others through unethical means. Dude, get real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe the author is stating an opinion, take it or leave it. If he had gone the other way and leaned more towards the pc a Mac fanboy would have come forward accused him of being a pc fanboy. Your criticism is out of line.

      Delete
    2. Unfortunately, I saw the author convenienty left out certain details like how PC hardware is superior to Mac hardware, while being half the price. And then he goes to say how PCs trump Macs on a certain category and still favors Macs. You should talk more specifics instead of unfounded generalizations for me to believe you.

      Delete
    3. I definitely wouldn’t call this an unbiased comparison review, especially on that hardware part. You can find numerous PC’s with better quality or specification for the same or lower price.

      Delete
  10. An interesting review. It bears out my own experience. I've been using Windows machines for over 16 years both at work and at home.

    About a year ago my second laptop in 3 years died and I bought a MacBook Pro. After a couple of weeks my Windows desktop at home was put into sleep mode and it has only been woken up a couple of times as my overriding preference is to use the Mac.

    When I first fired it up the display was an instant "WOW" with its clarity compared to a larger screen on the Windows laptop. For me colour rendition is much better as well.

    In my view it is no contest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know this is an old thread, but I was browsing through and these kind of statements drive me crazy. Of course you're going to prefer a brand spanking new computer to an old desktop!! It doesn't matter what brand. I just got a brand new desktop and I much prefer it to my four year-old laptop. And they're both PC's. I hate it when people compare brand new macs to 5 year old vista pcs.... Brand new stuff is always better...

      Delete
  11. I have to agree with Wind when this is NOT an "unbiased comparison review".

    "Nevertheless, Mac seems to be a more friendly, virus free, stable & highly optimized for performance."

    "Seems" is an opinionated word. You have no real data to back that claim up. While I agree that Macs are less prone to attacks by viruses, that's because there are way more people using Window based OS and it's not profitable for hackers to create a virus that infects an OS with so little user-base. While I can't comment on how "stable" your Window base PC is, I've have equal problems on the OS X and Windows. I don't know what kind of PC you use but my cheaper, Window based PC will run rings around any default OS X based Mac that is "highly optimized for performance."

    "It has the design WOW factor that many designers and creative people will just love to put on the work, at work or at home."

    Can't agree more. Apple creates clean cut products that looks good on the outside. Keyword: outside.

    "With Mac, you won't need to worry about hardware comparability issues & malicious codes that run on your computer."

    Wow, do you even do your research? I don't care what OS you run, you will always need to be worry about malicious codes. If there was such a thing as a malicious free OS, we would all be using it.

    "It is a proven product that found itself on the desk of many designers and photographers, and for a reason! (actually, many reasons)."

    Yes, because Apple geared their Macs toward multimedia fields. Can you say that it is a proven product that found itself on the desk of many non-designers and non-photographers?

    "Mac computers cost more, that's a fact. But if you take all the variables into consideration and Crumple them into time saving and effectiveness, I think that you will find Mac computers to be very friendly & affordable computers overall, better than a PC computer."

    ... can you say biased.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, if you're comparing macs to WINDOWS, which is the bigger issue, how can you say that Apple makes better hardware and give them a score of 1?? MICROSOFT DOESN'T MAKE HARDWARE. Where did this even come from? And comparing hardware of Apple to multiple PC brands is complete opinion. HP makes aluminum computers too... And those "magic" mice they give you are complete crap. They don't work well. By a logitech gaming mouse on sale and it will feel and work so much more smoothly and won't cost 100 dollars. Who cares about track pads anyway?

      Delete
  12. Idan -

    Currently, there is no IPS panel for any laptop. Even the 2010 Macbook Pros use TN panels.

    My mid-2009, 17" Macbook Pro uses a TN panel.

    Also, Apple should provide details of their hardware, and the hardware limitations when applicable. Until a week ago, I did not know that Apple deliberately disabled AHCI when using Boot Camp. Many of us need to use Windows apps and there is zero logic to Apple disabling AHCI. AHCI is a more efficient means of the computer accessing the hard drive.

    Especially as Mac's hardware has been the same off-the-shelf components as Windows PCs (Intel CPU, Intel chipset, nVidia chipset (graphics or northbridge), ATi (graphics), et cetera, people have a right to know. The technically uninclined won't care either way, but why force the rest of us into the same group?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Lastly, for all the claims Apple designs its equipment for graphic designers, it's funny how Mac Pro systems can't use two video cards at the same time (using SLI or Crossfire (nVidia and ATi respectively)) in OS X to boost graphics performance. Many 3D and 2D apps will use the graphics processor (GPU). On my 2009 Mac Pro, Pixel Blender aborts if I try to make effects in anything larger than 11x14" because there isn't enough video RAM (512MB, ATi 4870 - which was outdated in 2009, never mind now).

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wind...

    "I have a 5 year old Dell PC that has hardware that outlasts and outperforms all but the very NEWEST of the Macs. "

    Hmmm.... don't think so. Have you looked at the processors used in the new macs, especially the (admittedly expensive) MacPro? Geekbench everyone's system (or an equivalent PC benchmark program) and check one's facts before claiming that *anything* dell currently markets, let alone a 5 year old machine, comes within sailing distance of the Macs currently on the market...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Compare O/S with O/S.

      Brand New i7 with 8GB RAM running Windows Becnhmark - 5.6

      3 Yr old Windows 7 Intel Core 2 PC with 8 GB RAM - Windows benchmark - 5.4

      Are Mac really that much better?

      Delete
  15. Yeah another stupid MAC/PC debate.

    Please be patient, as it's long and I'll split it into a few parts.

    I’ll just rant about some technical stuff concerning the operating systems like Windows, GNU/Linux, Mac OSX, and BSD, applications are not my top priority right now:

    Windows 7 sucks, like every Windows had sucked over the years, don’t you just get bored after using it from 3.1 and for more than 15 years?? to have a Perfect Windows (7) system you have to have the super CPU, the super GPU, 64GB DDR3 RAM, a 512GB SSD, a good paid Anti-virus (because MSE can’t do every job altogether), and download (and crack if necessary) every fucking 3rd party app you need to customize your computer to your needs, in case you disagree with the kind of bloatware the OEMs have to offer for you, to make it work just like you wish to, perfectly, and yeah because it consumes 20GB of useless disk space when you have a fresh install and NO PDF READER??? but a bunch of stupid little games??? consuming at least 1GB DDR3 RAM with the Aero lit on?? Internet Exploiter consuming all the freaking RAM when I open lots of tabs and then closing then again until only remains ONE?? give me a break!!! Windows should be the gaming machine, and I’m surprised that still many industrial applications are made for Windows only or Windows like the first priority. For industrial and life-critical work it just sucks. Windows server with no CygWin for a network sucks even more.

    The “optimal” Windows 7, Ultimate, which can be close to the “perfect” windows system (with all of the care taken like I wrote above) is a prohibitively expensive operating system (200 USD anyone) compared to a regular release of mac OS which sometimes cost up to 60 USD, and of course, Linux and BSD, where most of their distributions are free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL my windows PC runs perfectly smooth on 6GB ram, core i5, 1TB hard drive... Pretty unreasonable assessment of the the hardware "requirements" for windows 7...

      Also, maybe because it was 2010, but you complain about speed and system resources and you're using internet explorer? Naub.

      PC's are gaming machines. $2000 will build you a pretty slick rig, while a Mac with the same specs may cost twice as much...

      Delete
    2. 64GB? First of all, only servers can carry that much RAM. Servers aren't normal PCs. They're not designed for gaming, photos, etc. There's designed for one thing: network traffic and of course you need RAM to handle all the people that can connect to it at one time. You obviously don't know the differences between machines nor can even talk about specific hardware. Super CPU and GPU? Please!

      P.S.: I agree with Anonymous. IE? Noob is right!

      Delete
  16. Linux is one of the best operating systems I’ve ever used in my life, just technically talking about the OS itself, not about the applications, it’s a really good operating system to be free (Ubuntu is starting to suck, so I recommend Linux Mint, BTW).

    An Operating System with the Linux kernel it’s really stable and secure, can automatically detect and load a driver for general hardware and some exotic hardware and save you LOTS of configuration time with some package management software like apt, yum… of course there are some rootkits and malware for linux, but the way it works and the steep development made into it makes it a good choice for industrial, scientific and life-critical systems.

    The actual downside with Linux and why it still does not make fit with many home users, it’s because of the nature it was made at the beginning of it’s history, because Microsoft is an oligarchic monopoly, and of course when you are out of luck and need to configure something manually (command line) can be sometimes a real PITA if something does not work out like you wish, e.g. some really exotic hardware or some other random configuration you need. Nothing is totally free of course, albeit you can spare some time to do the exact stuff you need with the exact tools, and unlike windows and mac, you can have an all-purpose and specific-purpose FREE operating system if you wish, you can install multiple desktop environments, apart from the general purpose ones (GNOME, KDE) you can install some optimized for netbooks and old hardware (xfce, lxde, openbox, fluxbox).

    ReplyDelete
  17. In conclusion, Windows works it just works, quirky but works, it's like you can't open the hood, but by realizing how the engine sounds you can certainly say by expertise it's a small messy one trying to propel a whole tank. And because it's monopolistic position, every imposed app into the educational systems works there, unfortunately; Linux, like the *BSD is the reliable operating system you know it will work even when you check and know what's under the hood, a powerful greasy engine; If don't know exactly what are you doing under the hood, like a good car engine, you may break and waste it, of course!!; and Mac OSX is like in the middle of windows and unix-like systems, with a reliable core, it's like you know the engine, but the the power distribution system is held
    shut, and if it gets rusty and then magically be opened, in the worst case scenario you might see it was damaged from the inside if you don't take care of it properly and by over-using your fancy car.

    I’ve used Windows for 16 years and Linux/BSD/Mac systems for 5 years. I hope my rant is useful for you.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yonose is an ignoramus that gives Mac users a bad name. First, learn how to spell and write properly so that we can at least understand what you're trying to say. Then, go out and get a proper education so that what you do say makes sense. Your rant is useful for no one!

    ReplyDelete
  19. To the author,

    You are indeed incorrect on some of your statements in the article as well as the comments, namely your statement that Apple manufacturs all of its components (they dont, several hardware mfr's in Asia do), as well as MacBook Pro's screen being an IPS. iMacs and cinema displays as well as the ipad have IPS panels, but the MBP's still are using TN panels. That info is all over the internet, as well as Apples website through the form of an omission of the screen specs, however they mention IPS displays on the other products. Gotta love that Apple marketing...*sigh*.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks Tyler, I did revise that part after going trough some information on Apple's website.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am a 4 year Dell PC user and I don't necessarily have too many opinions at this point, except that my pc doesn't do what it needs to do and in the short time i've had it have had to reformat 2 times and seen some serious blue screens of death and other unappreciated virus messages. I really am looking to make my own pro/ con list based on what I use my computer for and how it will interact with others that I need to connect to and networks I need to be connected on.
    Thanks for the info everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I always find it funny when people compare their $900 PC to a $1700 mac. You want a litmus test for "should I buy a mac?" Here ya go:

    Do computers scare you?

    Are you too scared to open the cover of the computer because you might "mess something up"?

    Do you hate to read manuals?

    Are you too busy making your... ahem... art to mess with figuring out how things work on your computer?

    Are you afraid of making choices about the programs you use?

    If you answered yes to these questions, then you definately should get a mac. And when you have a problem, PLEASE don't call your PC friends about it anymore. OK? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is probably the review everyone should be listening to right here. He explained it better than the author, lol.

      Delete
    2. Bravo, well put

      Delete
  23. hmm... how about a really unbiased review from an a real person who doesn't do reviews for a living?

    so i have this MAC for 2 years right? it's a mac book pro

    back then, i believe it was a little less than $2k.

    Now, what do I use my computers for?
    -I use them for surfing the internet, more specifically, youtube, facebook. I also use it for my homework, wikipedia, chatting (YM and MSN) Webcam viewing (YM, MSN, and Skype)

    When my computers don't do even just 1 of these things, it sucks.. PERIOD... why the hell it shouldn't?

    ----- Everyone relies on their computers and whether we use it for business or not, WE EXPECT TOUR COMPUTERS TO DO THESE BASIC TASKS-----

    x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
    MY MAC (http://netzonerepairs.com/Images/MacBook%20Pro%2015.4.jpg)

    Did my mac do it?
    -No.It stayed inside my house the whole time. and it wasn't used as much and it broke down 6 months ago..

    Was Mac worth it?
    -No. the mac was more of my money. my PC was so much cheaper. MY PC

    x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x


    MY PC
    (http://www.lamaisoninfo.com/catalog/images/products/portables-15-156/portableslaptops/Dell_D810.jpg)

    I bought another desktop computer at office depot. I really cant tell you what it is since i dont remember what it is now and there is no brand on it.. however, the on/off switch has a blue LED light that glows when on (ooooooooooh!!! glowing buttons)
    The anti-virus was like.. 80$? 120$ the most?
    But the good thing about it is, I can install it on MORE than 1 computer.
    ----------------------------------
    Maintaining the PC was much pricey but the amount accumulated through time. like buying new anti-viruses every year, buying NEW GADGETS that go along with it
    -Logitech webcams
    -logitech wireless mouse
    -Logitech wireless Keyboard (more logitech??)
    -Altec LAnsing computer sound system (http://altec-lansing-computer-speakers.com/images/altec%20lansing%20computer%20speakers%201.jpg) LOOK AT THAT.. it's such a beautiful thing to me.. it even has a subwoofer

    Not to mention the things i install on my pc like:
    -Popcap games (they're fun btw even though they look goofy or stupid at first e.g plants vs zombies.. but they're the best games ever)
    -MSN <<(it's better on PC version btw)
    -YM <<<(it's more functional on PC version too)
    -YM clients <<<(never compatible with MAC)
    -Zune!!! <<<(i've had the i-pod before.. when it got overrated, i tried the zune.. and i never looked back. now, microsoft did this wacky thing about getting all your microsoft IDs linked all together, and everyone... EVERYONE who can access it CAN see what i play and listen to on my ZUNE, what i play on my Xbox, what i do on my MSN what i do on my facebook)


    Also, i can do so much more on PC... SOOOOOOOOOO MUCH MORE!!!

    - i can change my CD drive.. like my DVD drive... since DVD is not in trend anymore... i just bought my new BLU ray drive and have installed it yesterday.


    Now.. I don't know how it feels like to have a MAC desktop.. and by how Mac book pro make me experience the "potential" if what a Mac could do?, I have to say I'm not impressed. And after that, nothing could convince me of buying a $5,000 or so that will not even outlast or outperform my PC.

    And for the virus part... I don't believe that Mac being less susceptible to viruses makes it more superior than the PC.. as a matter of fact, this is what makes the PC more credible with performance. WHY?? Because if I was a hacker, virus maker (or whatever they're called), I WOULDN'T MAKE VIRUSES FOR AN OS THAT HAS THE LEAST AMOUNT OF AUDIENCE.


    please MAC users... stop even trying to make people believe how MAC can be better than PC. If something is that good, IT WILL SELL ITSELF.

    ReplyDelete
  24. so true. one of best analyses ever. wait. is that the plural of analysis?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Idan. This is Charles, you first commenter, 6 months afterward. Once I went Mac, there was no looking back. The entire Apple paradigm works for me. What turns me on... the simplicity of the interface, the quality of the products, and yes, the aesthetics.

    The comments on screen for photo color editing are right. It wouldn't have changed my mind in the Mac v. PC debate, but I don't think I really appreciated that aspect of the screens before I went Mac. If I do more print stuff, I am going to have to think how to work around the bias of the beautiful, bright Apple screen.

    The iMac has been flawless, but the MacBook Pro has had freeze-ups and funky stuff. I had hoped not to see those kind of things on OSX. Perhaps it is the difference in configuration; the IMac is a max config, whereas the MacBook is just basic. I may be hitting some system resource issues on the laptop.

    From time to time, I have to troubleshoot someone's PC, and I just sigh and say to them, "When are you going to get a Mac?" Windows and all that 3 party hardware seems like a distant memory.

    There is no going back for me now. I am hooked.

    Charles

    ReplyDelete
  26. Macbooks cannot dock on company server (in case u work for any company that matters).fail.kthxbye

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Chaz

    About your MacBook Pro freezes maybe your hitting on this issue: http://mbp-freeze.wikispaces.com/
    but as reported on Apple forums seams resolved.

    As for Mac's not good for Enterprise networks environments its just a comment done out of ignorance.Complex network environments on IT Business are not about Excel or Word that most of people just expect everyone use. I suggest some reading on the subject: http://www.apple.com/business/solutions/it/

    @Blueberry you said

    -I use them for surfing the internet, more specifically, youtube, facebook. I also use it for my homework, wikipedia, chatting (YM and MSN) Webcam viewing (YM, MSN, and Skype)

    Are you really saying a Mac don't do one of the above? Are you for real? Even a phone can do that and any internet connected device independent of the OS for that matter.

    Bottom line if you don't know how to use the OS search the web for answers don't blame the OS (no matter what OS)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I hate the constant updates, PERIOD!!!!!! If windows is sooo awesome, why can't I go 2 weeks without a lengthy update slowly filling up my hard drive????? I'm getting a Mac, just out of pure frustration!!!! LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I built an HP from the ground up for less than a thousand, and pretty much doubled what I could've gotten from Apple with it. I have yet to have an issue, a virus, a crash, any issue of any sort for that matter. What's more, since I was a computer technician, I know how to handle my machine very well and can customize the way my programs work. Macintosh does not offer this option. Customization is, as stated limited. My girlfriend asked me to fix her computer...and my response was: "I'm sorry, I can't, Apple's copyrights prohibit me from doing this legally."

    I'm against Apple because I know how they treat their customers. They confine you to the company, their copyrights abuse your freedom, and what's more, their support is inferior to that of HP. I mean, to me it's a no brainier, the Mac is just a fashion thing...it's like wearing plaid shorts because everyone else does. Half the people who own one don't know what exactly it is they paid so much for.

    In the end, it comes down to personal preference though. I've been in arguments with people who've literally only been able to tell me that they like the Macbook because it's made of "shiny metal." At least research it and compare them before you buy Apple...because once you do, they will keep you in that company...whether you like it or not.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Agree with poster above. I build pc's and they are faster more powerful for way less money than Apple. Apple is great for the layperson I suppose. But proprietary parts and all that is just disgusting to someone like me who can build my own way better and customize it. Btw if Apple was the dominant operating system for all these years and even know.. it would be the one plagued with the majority of viruses and malware. Pc power user and gamer signing off.

    ReplyDelete
  31. i want a mac! Although, i just got my pc. I dont want to use more money up.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Mac is great, i have a mac on my work and a PC on my home. But i have to say, if you really need brute force (gaming and 3D applications) but you dont have the budget, BUY a PC! If you choose your components wisely and assemble yourself a PC, you can have a great machine spending much less than if you choose a imac. But if money is no problem for you, so BUY a MAC.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Bottom line....use the tool that you NEED to get the job done!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yep, Mac has good hardware, which might well be the only good thing going for it, and even that isn't so good-for the general user, the OS won't run the GPU anywhere near the full potential, because what can you do with it? Frogger in HD? The only benefits arise if you're into video editing and have a ton of money to blow on a machine that would do only that, or you use a virtual machine for gaming. Mac is good for a few uses,like video editing and music production, but to the average user, it's a $2,000 dollar Facebook machine.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yep, Mac has good hardware, which might well be the only good thing going for it, and even that isn't so good-for the general user, the OS won't run the GPU anywhere near the full potential, because what can you do with it? Frogger in HD? The only benefits arise if you're into video editing and have a ton of money to blow on a machine that would do only that, or you use a virtual machine for gaming. Mac is good for a few uses,like video editing and music production, but to the average user, it's a $2,000 dollar Facebook machine.

    ReplyDelete