September 19, 2010

Nikon D90 vs. D7000 - Should I Upgrade?

Nikon D90 vs D7000, upgrade?

Nikon D7000 is already getting huge attention. The most common question that I hear about the Nikon D7000 is whether it is worth upgrading from the D90?. Well, the Nikon D90 is an amazing DSLR. In August 8, 2010, I was going through the 2010 BCNRanking for the DSLR and Mirrorless market in Japan. The numbers can probably speak from themselves, with the Nikon D90 is at the firs place with 13.0% market share.  The D90 has stepped over the Canon EOS Kiss X3 (11.5%). Nikon has really succeeded in penetrating the enthusiast market with great success.


On September 15, 2010, Nikon has introduced a new DSLR, the Nikon D7000. In this Nikon D90 vs. D7000 comparison review, I want to go through the D7000 specs and compare them against the D90 specs. Not always when a new DSLR is announced, it means that you should immediately upgrade to that new model. It mostly depends on the type of your shooting habits. For one photographer, a better lens will probably be a smarter investment, and for another, the D7000 will be a dream come true. So let's go through the main features, and see what are the main advantages of each one. Later, you can decide if the Nikon D7000 is really worth the upgrade price. I am considering that you already have the Nikon D90, and want to make an upgrade to the D7000. OK, let's start.

Sensor

The first change that you observe from the specs is the new sensor. The D7000 sensor has higher resolution (16.2MP) compared to the D90 (12.3MP). I think that Nikon has decided to utilize a higher resolution sensor, because of photo editing needs of enthusiast photographers. When you've got more resolution, it means that you get more freedom when cropping your images. Both enthusiast and professional photographers understand the importance of editing their images in photo editing software. For the Entry-Level DSLR market, it is less significant. Having a photo editing software like Adobe Lightroom 3, can really help improving the picture, especially if you shoot RAW.


As an enthusiast-amateur photographer, I find myself polishing many of my digital images in photo editing software. Editing your pictures in photo editing software is a natural process of getting the best possible image., especially when you shoot raw. Some photographers look at it like a digital dark room. So more pixels, means more cropping freedom. Even so, when you have more pixels on a sensor of the same size, it also means higher pixel density (D90: 3.3 MP/cm², D7000: 4.6 MP/cm²). At the same time, it can lead to more noise in high-ISO settings. There is a balance of how much pixels you can put on a sensor, before you can see a degrade of image quality. Even so, camera sensors keep improving, and large pixel count doesn't always mean lower image quality.

We currently don't have any lab-test reviews which test this claim, but I have a feeling that the Nikon D7000 won't disappoint in this area. So you can call it an advantage over the Nikon D90, especially if you want to have more options for cropping your images later.

Having more megapixels also means that you can produce large prints. I personally don't usually print my picture, but keeping them on my computer and on a backup hard drive. The difference is small between 16.2MP and 12.MP, so not a real advantage for photographers who love to print their images.

ISO

We can see a difference in the ISO range between the D7000 and the D90. The Nikon D7000 allows shooting in ISO 100 up to 6400, whether the D90 native ISO starts from 200 up to 3200. Both cameras have an extended mode. The D7000 can climb up to 25600, whether the D90 goes up to ISO 6400.
The one step advantage of the Nikon D7000 can become a real advantage, only if the image quality will satisfy photographers demands. In many cases, the image quality in the top ISO setting is usable for small prints only. However, as I told you earlier, there are many enthusiast photographers who are already familiar with noise reduction software, and tend to use them frequently. In practice, you can take a ISO 6400 noisy image, and turn it to a silky noiseless smooth image. I personally use Neat Image, but there are other good products out there.
Higher ISO setting, means that you can shoot images that otherwise weren't possible. It's all depend on the camera, lens, lighting and skills. Even if you take all of that into account, still, having higher sensitivity can really help getting that important shot. It is very important when taking picture in low lighting environments, were lighting condition are far from being optimal.

I see the ISO 25600 an advantage for some photographers. Even so, I rather stay with the D90 and spend my money on a faster lens, then upgrading to the Nikon D7000 alone. Having a fast optical stabilized lens can really helps sometimes. Of course the VR won't help you out much when the subject is moving, but in many cases, it is very helpful. If you tend to shoot with a telephoto lens without a VR, you should probably think of spending your money on a better lens, rather then upgrading. Overall, I think the better ISO sensitivity is an advantage for both enthusiast and professional photographers.

SDXC Support

SDXC is the next generation memory cards, features higher capacity and fast Read/Write speeds. Furthermore, with SDXC card you get higher performance when transferring images to your computer. According to my knowledge, the Nikon D90 doesn't support SDXC memory cards, only up to SDHC. Maybe it will be supported in the next firmware, I don't know. So as far as I know, the D7000 supports SDXC and the D90 does not (correct me if I am wrong).

SDXC cards will continue to be developed and upgraded over the next years. They will come in larger capacities and faster Read/Write speeds. In terms of storage, the D7000 is future proof, for now. Not anyone should look at it as a negative aspect. I think that there are many enthusiast photographers who still use average speed capacity cards.  After saying that, I also think that if you shoot a picture in the full camera resolution (16.2MP) or/and in RAW format, the SDXC has an advantage. Memory card's prices will continue to drop from month to moth. Because you will probably keep your camera for around 2-5 years, it seems that the SDXC comparability is a real advantage.

Dual Memory Cards Slot

The Nikon D7000 comes with a dual memory card slot. Yes, you can use two SD/SDHC/SDXC cards together in-camera. It means more storage, without the need to insert a new card. If you shoot JPEG+RAW, this extra slot will help you separate RAW files from JPEG files. Furthermore, You can use the extra card for backup. Even so, the main advantage of having another card is probably for shooting HD videos. If you leave the battery life aside, having a large memory capacity, means longer HD videos. This is even more important if you shoot videos on in 1080p Full HD, which the D7000 supports.

Having an extra memory card slot is a great advantage. Of course you can live without it, but if you mainly shoot RAW or love capturing 1080p HD movies, this is a very important feature for you.

1080p HD Videos (up to 20min)

Nikon D7000 is capable of shooting 720p and 1080p HD videos. The Nikon D90 only features 720p videos. 1080p will be a standard on future Nikon DSLR cameras from this day forwards. Even so, when comparing the D90 vs. the D7000, the D7000 has certainly has an advantage of having both 720p and 1080p. This advantage will probably be more important for photographers who intend to take advantage of that feature. There are photographers who don't really care about 1080p or the HD video feature.

If you find yourself shooting a lot of videos and watching them on your Full HD HDTV display, then the 1080p/24 becomes a clear advantage here. If you don't intend to shoot many HD videos, this feature is certainly not worth the upgrade. Regarding the video quality, we still need to stay up to date with future in-depth reviews. By observing the Nikon D7000 video samples that exist on the web, I think that the image quality as improved a bit.

The Nikon D7000 also allows photographers to shoot 1080p HD videos up to 20 minutes long. The D90's video capture is limited to 5 minutes. At lower resolutions, you can capture videos up to 20 minutes. So if you love shooting high-resolution HD videos, the D7000 is probably worth consideration.

Another thin that I have almost forgotten to mention is that the D7000 also supports full time AF while shooting videos. The D7000 utilized contrast-detect AF system to allow photographers to get AF while shooting movies.

1/8000 sec Shutter Speed & 6fps Burst

Having faster shutter speeds is certainly an advantage for sports photographers.  Pack it together with 6 fps vs. Nikon D90 4.5 fps, and you get a better sports photography DSLR. For many sports photographers, this feature alone worth upgrading from the Nikon D90. Nikon has also employed a brand new 39-point AF system and a new 2,016 pixel RGB 3D Matrix Metering System. Taking all of those variables into consideration, if I was a sports photographer, I would most definitely think about upgrading to the D7000.

Upgrade? - It Depends

Other improvements include a 100% coverage Pentaprism viewfinder, compared to the D90 96% coverage. The D7000 is a bit heavier (~80g) than the D90. The D7000 employs Nikon's EXPEED 2 imaging processor, Active D-Lighting and magnesium alloy body. Overall, the Nikon D7000 presents a new landmark for Nikon. It has raised the bar again, and really made the competition very interesting.

Whether you should upgrade to the Nikon D7000 from the D90, it is all up to you. You should carefully consider the advantages by going through the specs. If you find that there is an important feature that you find on the Nikon D7000 and not on the D90, maybe it will worth the upgrade. Even so, I think that before making a decision, you should ask yourself, whether you should buy a new better lens or spend your money on the D7000. It is a great DSLR, that I am sure that will satisfy the most enthusiast photographer.

It is more durable due to the Magnesium alloy chassis and its shutter was tested to 150K shots. It seems like Nikon has improved almost every feature, by presenting a new DSLR that can easily compete against its rivals. Nikon really deserves "Thumbs Up!" on this one.


118 comments:

  1. i think there are a lot of d200 owners out there who will grab this camera. I certainly am one of them

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found your review and links very helpful. I am upgrading from a D80 and was very close to going to a D90, but decided for the D7000. Thanks very much!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Was going to purchase a D90 and was told to wait for the D7000. Then i saw your review. Am definitely getting the D7000! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks you so much for this great review and keep posting !!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shouldn't it be 20 minutes, not 25?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've checked again and you are right, 20 minutes. I corrected it in the post. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I keep my D90 in my bag. Unless you really need super fast body for sport burst. Anyways there will be NO difference regarding image quality between D90 and D7000. Better invest in the right glass than in the body IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
  8. So a bigger sensor with a higher mp count means no image difference? i highly doubt it. The new sensor delivers images with a maximum resolution of 4928x3264 pixels, which gives it 640 more pixels horizontally and 416 more vertically than the D90.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It looks like an impressive camera. I can't wait to see test results on DXOmark for a noise rating on the sensor.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous (Oct 12): Is it really a bigger sensor on the D7000? It's in fact marginally smaller than on the D90.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am planning to buy a D90. Will that be a bad move considering this would be my first DSLR?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I was planning to buy D90 (my first DSLR) too...and now after that comparison review i'm confused i think :p I may wait some time to get mor money and go for D7000.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I would just get the D90. I have a D90 and its an amazing camera. Unless you really need the extra features (movie and faster shutter speeds) the D90 is a great camera at a much lower price. As some mentioned above, I would rather keep the D90 and buy a better lens then use the D7000 on its stock lens. Also, there will always be a better camera coming out, so i would just buy the one that fits your budget and start shooting, instead of saving for the higher models.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why do people keep getting sucked into buying the newest things. For most people (95%) the D90 is quite enough. I shoot for a living, and I use an F6, D700, and a D90. Glass is where it is. Amateurs keep buying the latest stuff thinking their pictures will improve. You are wrong. Including those cameras, I have owned 5 in my lifetime, and Don't need to upgrade for quite a while.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I still got my D80, and I'm happy with it. D7000 is marginally better than D90 which again is marginally better than D80, and it's only at high iso's that you can actually see the difference. I'm not shooting in the dark, and I can live with some other short comings as well (live view, video). I agree with the previous post, but I look forward to the release of D400 next year.

    ReplyDelete
  16. just let me remind you all, hotographer is only as good as he/she is, and not how good their camera is. just as simple as that...

    ReplyDelete
  17. I have a D90 - wont be replacing any time saoon. It's going to become a digital classic.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If I don't already own a D90 I would go for D7000, since I have one, I would go for better glass.

    ReplyDelete
  19. We won't be so unthinking as to "upgrade" every time there's something new on the market when it comes to TV, hi-fi, car or apartment/house, etc. Why all the craze about a new DSLR model? I agree D90 not only remains a best-selling digital camera but will become a DSLR classic.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The D90 has and still is a wonderful camera. I have fired it 50000 times over the last two years and never felt there was something missing or desired. It has paid itself 7 times so far and performs admirably and consistently. I do not see a single reason to upgrade, just because Nikon released another wonderful camera. I will, when I feel I need to.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is my op.

    16 mp - big files, ok for cropping, my screen is 2000x1600 so can't se it anyway

    39 points inkl 9 cross - very nice!! But only interesting for fast moving things

    Magnesium alloy - I'm one of those not throwing around with it

    1080p movies - not shooting that many movies, much heavier files for editing
    Autofocus movies - I have read that they are not there yet, interesting movies is when your make interesting focus yourself
    20 min movies - borring long clips, I am the MTV gen and need less than 3 sec scenes at a time

    Iso high - well I think the 25000 iso is appealing for spies, for low light shooting get a high aperture glas and a flash and learn to control it

    Sdxc cards - well for normal low speed photos remember to spread pictures to many small cards and thereby reducing risk of loosing everything if card breaker

    Dual cards - give it to me :) knock on wood, my one card d90 have not messed it up yet and I can sort pictures from movies in LR and nobody is shooting raw and jpg on one session anyways

    Just some thoughts :)

    I'm for a better glas !!!

    Nice review btw :-)

    Henrik

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thanks! for the review.
    If anyone owned a D80 and need a upgrade, go for D90 and save your money for faster lens. Because the upgrade allows you to use all the accessories use on your D80, a big plus!

    ReplyDelete
  23. The biggest plus of the D7000 hitting the streets is that the price on D90's has dropped significantly, both new and used. That means that you could get something like the D90 18-105 kit and a 70-300 VR for the price of the D7000 with the 18-105, a solution giving you far greater flexibility and pictures.

    A lot of people new to photography doesn't seem to understand that when it comes to camera bodies you should always go for the one that satisfies your needs at the lowest possible price, while you should never skimp on glass. A good lens will be useful for decades if you take care of it, a digital camera body, even the latest and greatest, will be obsolete in a couple of years. The difference in image quality between different crop sensor dslrs is a non-issue today, it's only about features on the camera. A beginner won't get better pictures from a D7000 than from a D40, but getting a better lens will produce much greater results.

    ReplyDelete
  24. In Europe price of D90 is half of D7000, so I'll buy better lens with D90. If you are movie shooter then maybe, but still D90 is good investment.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The only thing I think worth mentioning about the D7000 is the HD recording... but then again, hello people?!... This is a DSLR camera, it is meant to take pictures. If you want to do video recording, go buy a camcorder. I would go for the D90 anytime and safe the extra money for better/faster lenses.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I'm new in photography guys, as i read articles, inputs and comments regarding these two cameras, i think the smartest way for me to start is to get the d90 and invest on good lenses. it will give my budget a greater value and satisfaction, as this will be my first DSLR camera. i think this will be a good start for me, to learn and explore the beauty of photography. As most of the guys said, its on photographer not on the camera :)peace!
    Nice comments guys, keep it coming!

    ReplyDelete
  27. that is a great review! thank you for the help. i am very very interested in photography and have worked with different canon and olympus cameras by borrowing them from friends etc. i have finally decided that it is time for my personal camera. i thought i wanted a d7000 but when i think about it d90 seems better becouse new cameras come and go but i guess the d90 is still up at the top even though there are new ones. so it must be a great decision to get a d90. i guess i will go with the d90. what do you think? :D

    ReplyDelete
  28. Just bought my D90 yesterday after reading various reviews including the one here for the past few months. As an amatour photogapher, I am really happy with the peformance of my D90 considering the huge price difference with D7000. My only concern is whether Nikon will continue D90 poduction and its support or D7000 is going to be a replacement all togehter in years to come.

    ReplyDelete
  29. vou comprar a minha D 90 amanhã

    ReplyDelete
  30. i highly doubt that higher pixel yields better picture, unless of course there's a newer sensor technology with much less noise at higher density.
    one thing is for sure, the denser pixel you have for an certain area, the more you get close to tiny dust. i think d7000 has been made to lure folks into believing that higher MP means better picture. what i wish for is a d900 say = d5000 + d90 + metal body + two-lens kit.. :)
    my analysis: d90 is optimal, d7000 is borderline.
    i love d90 that i can only afford d5000.
    How about D90X? D900?
    nonetheless, i would say that d7000 is a better body....haven't seen a picture to compare it with tho

    ReplyDelete
  31. I have not seen the pictures from a D7000, but it will really hard to outperform D90 pictures, every time I take pictures I am stunned, and the naked eye will only see at a human level, how far can we go, if you have one keep it and invest in lenses, if you dont go still buy the D90 because it is cheaper, now you have the money get the D7000. Another point DSLR are for pictures, now everything claims to capture 1080i incuding pocket phones.
    D90 Lover for life.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I finally could afford to buy my very first DSLR for Christmas and D7000 came out. Well I been really keeping a lot just so I could buy a d90 after considering d40 & d60 where d90 was much better for a newbie all up to a professional.

    I did think about the price for a d7000 and with that amount I could buy more stuff for the d90. So I was not alone with that thinking after reading all the review here and convince my choice a D90 is still the best choice for a newbie on DSLR.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I have owned the D90 for about 8 months now. I am also a experienced photographer. This camera is capable of taking pictures better than I am able to make it do. The pictures are excellent. Bottom line, spend your time becoming a better photographer not on the latest equiptment. I can tell you from experience, spend the money on fast glass upfront and you will not be disapointed.

    ReplyDelete
  34. D90 is history...... D7000 is the future!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  35. I have had my D40 for about 2 years and I feel I am ready to upgrade in the next month or two. After reading this and the comments, I think I will stick with the D90 as I had initially planned to do- thanks, this was very helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Thanks for the review - bought D90 1 year ago my first DSLR camera still learning to use it. I bought VRII 18-200 lens. Agree with the advise go for better glass importantly learn to use it first.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I am an "impulsive photo hobbyist" I just treated myself to a D90. Previously I was using a D50 for the last good "5 to 6 years". And I still love the D50 because that's the camera that taught me everything and is backward compatible, same with the D90. can use old AF and AI lenses. Save tons of money and still get wonderful pictures. Second hand is also a good place to start!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Great reviews here..D90 came into my life for over than 7 months and i'm still can't forget about it even for a day,it keep me on the desire to touch it,to feel it.yes,some of you are true,lets keep up with d90(for those who'd had it)and look for a better glass.D90 is a Legend....

    ReplyDelete
  39. All the above comments seem pretty accurate to me. :)

    I own and use the D90 professionally. I bought it over the D300 for two reasons...1. for the slightly better High ISO performance, and 2. because for half the price, I get 90% or better of the capability of the D300 and was able to add a decent mid zoom for $450 (used Tokina 50-135mm 2.8). Now that I am up to 100,000 shutters, I'll probably do two things. 1. buy a D7000 as my new main camera. 2. Have my D90 refurbished as a great backup camera. My main reason for upgrading is the more robust body on the D7000. Over time, my battery grip and lens mount have both loosened slightly to the point of where they sometimes disconnect from the body electrics. For general use, this wouldn't be an issue. But, for pro use, it can be annoying if it causes me to miss a shot. Remember, this is after many hours of continuous use. So, it is not a fault of the camera at all. I'm just hoping that the D7000's magnesium body might be able to handle a few more bumps and stay tight to the connectors.

    I'm just adding this in case any of you have this consideration.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I don't understand why people think so much.. It is very simple if you have money go ahead buying D7000 otherwise Stick with D90.

    ReplyDelete
  41. d90's ISO can be pushed to 12500 (Hi2)

    ReplyDelete
  42. I was going to buy a d90, until I heard the d7000 came out. reading comparassions the d7000 is better than the d90, it includes a lot of features that with knowledge could really make a difference. like you all said getting a new camera its a big investment. so i would rather spend a little bit more money to get the d7000 and over the months keep buying new lenses as this is more likely than buying a new camera. My point is that is more easy to buy a lense than a body. This review has been really helpful incluiding the comments. Looking forward to buy the d7000

    ReplyDelete
  43. A few relevant facts worth mentioning(I'm a pro BTW):
    Magnesium "body" on d7000 is only covering the back and the top of the body....the most important part around the lens mount where all the strain induced by a heavy lens is, it's still plastic....
    The $600 price difference in between the two won't buy you much "fast glass"...maybe a third party lens manufacturer
    d7000 is about a stop better in low light which is huge....i.e. crank the ISO at 3200 instead of 1600 and just shoot with your f4.5 lens kit instead of investing in af 2.8 heavy pro glass

    ReplyDelete
  44. By now, most people interested in photogaphy know the differences between D7000 and D90. If one uses the same good lenses for both, the only thing that counts on whether to buy one or the other, or upgrade from what you have or get the latest, D7000, is really cost. There is no doubt D7000 is better that D90 technologically. The price difference is about $500.00. So anybody who can afford that $500 extra on D7000 and will get the same good lenses that he/she would have gotten for D90, should go for D7000. For those who want to save $500, even though they can afford it, go for D90 which no doubtis a very good camera.

    ReplyDelete
  45. After reading and reading the pros and cons, I decided on the D90 with 18-105mm, 55-300mm VR and a 50 mm 1.8 lenses. Very happy with my decision and the photos!

    ReplyDelete
  46. All good comments. I'm the proud owner of a D90. Great picture quality. If you want more than that, you have to invest in filters, flash, lens and so on. Taking a picture is a relation between the person and the camera.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Hi everyone, Just a bought a D90 in Singapore today, came with alot of freebies, i was deciding between D3100 and D90, but after holding the two camera, I decided to go for the D90 as it felt more solid and robust, a bit worried at first about buying a camera that was released about two years ago but after reading the comments, I feel more at ease, can wait to play with my new toy :)

    ReplyDelete
  48. Chiming in here as a member of the D90 crew, bought it almost two years ago and it still runs and takes pictures like new. Fantastic camera. The main advantage I see for the D7000 over the D90 is marginally higher resolution and maybe a stop of noise advantage.

    After some hemming and hawing I have decided not to pursue my "technolust" but instead investing the money I'd have to spend on the D7000 in nice speedy f1.4 & f1.8 glass.

    Ultimately, for me the deciding factor was, that the ability to go to high ISO without worrying is nice, but-- not even having to there is even nicer. :)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Hi,

    If you can own a D7000 go for it or else D90 is just fine. If you have D90 then wait for few years there will be better cameras than D90 and D7000.

    Invest in a better glass and make a system for yourself than changing camers every now and then.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I have had the D.90 for almost 2 years and love it so much. If it goes into history, it will go very favourably as a great classic. I have used my D.90 for both stills & video. I made music vidoes with the D.90 and it does have limitations, but I have learned to work inside these, and done some pretty fine stuff. The only reason I may upgrade to the D.7000 is for some extra wider scope in video, but I will be using my D.90 as a second camera. Dedicated video cameras won't cut it, until you spend really huge bucks. I am prioritizing to buy good glass before buying the D.7000.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Most threads I've read (when reading up on the D7000) compares with the D90. I've had the D80 for 3 years now and itching to upgrade, but maybe I don't really need to. Put in a different perspective, What will I miss on my D80 if I get the D7000? I can sell my D80 so that will help offset the cost. I shoot mostly outdoors (travel related), some indoors, sometimes flowers. IQ is very important to me.

    ReplyDelete
  52. PS:

    "I still got my D80, and I'm happy with it. D7000 is marginally better than D90 which again is marginally better than D80, and it's only at high iso's that you can actually see the difference."

    If it's marginal from my D80, maybe I should sit back and continue to enjoy my D80 and buy a new lens or flash.

    ReplyDelete
  53. As seen in the review there are many nice features in the D7000 that makes it very attractive. I bought the D90 first which I liked very much, but in the end the fast focus of the D7000 and other features got the better of me and I ended up exchanging it for the D7000. I passed on the more expensive Nikkor 18-200 VR lens and got the Sigma 18-200 DC OS HSM lens which is almost half the price of the former. Very happy with the choice.

    ReplyDelete
  54. well i am still stuck - i love my d60 but feel its time to move on the d7000 is amazing with lots of safe settings for the advanced amateur but the d90 is cheaper and still has a few safe settings - i take judo photos in dark gyms so help me out - i often use my 50mm 1.4 and get not bad shots so d90 or d7000 x

    ReplyDelete
  55. In this year 2011..I keep my d90 in my bag....

    the d7000 is better just for take a photo in sport and quick shot...that is not realy necessary for me....surly , till now d90 is better than d7000 with this price...

    ReplyDelete
  56. I plan to use this D7k for the next 5 years..(or as long as it holds good) and no intention of changing it.even if smthing bright comes next... I can live with the kit lens for now and probably get new lenses every 6 months.. I fall under all the different photo categories.. like sport, low light..
    So in this case, going for a better body and latest model like D7K makes sense.. or getting D90.. I still prefer D7k.. though i have to master everything in it.. and plan to use it till it dies..
    worth investing 500k more now.. ? please help..
    well. certainly in a tight budget and D7k is one huge investment..or expense. for me !! now.

    ReplyDelete
  57. If you are in a tight budget, then it's a no brainer to get the D90, which is a great camera and a great bargain now.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Was going to purchase a D90. Then i saw your review. Am definitely getting the D7000! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  59. I have a D40 and have been looking to upgrade and saw this D7000 in the store over Christmas. I also have considered the D90. I just want good quality pics, especially in low light. My D40 just isn't there. Close, but not what I need. I definitely need more pixels and low light settings. Not sure which way to go. The lower price of the 90 is attractive, but I can afford the 7000. Also will the lenses from the D40 fit the 90 and 7000?

    ReplyDelete
  60. I own a D90 with VRII 18-200mm lens...very satisfied with it and no plans of upgrading to D7000. Buy some more better lens in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Yes, the lenses from D40 will fit. This is one edge of Nikon over all other brands- it is backward compatible. I've D90 and I'm in love with it. For some reason, D90 is like a landmark in Nikon cameras and will always be talked over and remembered even after couple of more years. Like another user said in a review, I just feel to touch it, to hold it on days when i dont ahve to take pictures- I have not seen D7000 in person, which Ia m sure will be a great camera as it s based on D90. But D90 is a Gem in Nikon DSLRs. I own a 50mm 1.4 which makes up for all the advantages that D7000 has, over D90 plus that its a lens and not a feature in the camera. With D7000, you still will need a lens. Love my D90 and I am sure D7000 is of the same level!

    ReplyDelete
  62. I have my D50 for 3 years now. My first dslr. I have the kit lens (18-55mm) plus a Sigma 18-200mm. GOOD camera, TIPA AWARD WINNER. I've made nice pics but I want to improve the quality of my pictures. I'am considering buying a D90 next week. Was planning to invest in the D7000 but reading these tremendous comments the the D90 is ok for me. But first I want to know if it makes sence to buy better lenses (18-105mm VR or 18-200mm VRII) for my old D50 to improve the quality of my pictures? I'am an amateur photographer willing to learn from other Nikonians.

    ReplyDelete
  63. As Anonymous above wrote, I also own a D50 and I'm looking to upgrade. The thing I'm least satisfied with is noise, the small display and bad white balance. I find it hard to get natural tones in photos and always need to edit them quite a lot afterwards. I've got a set of lenses and it's the same with all of them. So glass is not the issue - it's the camera itself.

    I thought about buying the D7000 but I'm starting to lean towards the D90 now, as many others here. It's definitely the 500€ difference that's tipping me over to the cheaper option. I shot a few photos this weekend with my friends D90 and the feel was awesome compared to the D50. But I'll put the extra 500€ on new optics with stabilizer instead.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I have owned a D90 for nearly 2 years and still love it as I did on day one. My feeling is that if you have a D90, stick with it till the next generation (post 7000) comes along but if you don't, go for the D7000. You will forget about the 500 euro after a little while. It has many worthwhile improvements and it won't feel so old when the next model comes along.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Hi, I'm a newbie here and have been eyeing up the D90 for a while now. After seeing the comments above I think I will stick to the D90 and invest in lenses.

    However my only concern is I do a lot of climbing and trekking and am thinking the magnesium alloy body will pip my decision to the D7000. It's not like I'm going to be throwing the cameras around and I will have it well padded etc.

    So in terms of toughness how have people found the D90? Is there much difference between it and the D7000. (I realise few people will have used both).

    Cheers

    Jon

    ReplyDelete
  66. I have a D300 and have saved up for a new MacBook Pro. Since this has a SD card ownership of a Cf camera looks less attractive so I will be selling the D300. The comments above push me towards the D90, if ebay is nice to me it may be a no or low cost changeover. Downgrade- I doubt it. there are a few things I'll miss, mirror up, LV, 220 grammes. The greatest risk I take regularly involves immersion in sea water- The less I stand to lose the better

    ReplyDelete
  67. D7000 is an amazing camera. If you are in the market to buy a new NIKON, you should go for it. Its focusing speed is incredible, plus all the build in functions that help you to do editing. Also, it is easy to operate, I have not open my manual yet , but able to use 85% of the camera. NIKON really did a good job on this D7000.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Thanks for explaining so much in detail. I'll go D7000. Asif

    ReplyDelete
  69. Is the kit lense with the D7000 better than the kit lens with the D40? Wondering if I should just buy the D7000 body only and use my D40 lense and maybe put the diff in a better lens. I need a good low light zoom lens for school concerts and plays. Affordable suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
  70. I have the D90 and I love it, I will not change it for the world!!!

    ReplyDelete
  71. To the person asking about D7000 vs. D40 kit lenses:
    D7000 kit lens (18-105 VR) is far more versatile than D40 kit lens (18-55 non-VR). This is both due to the addition of vibration reduction and the additional focal length. The D7000 kit lens is a decent multi-use "walking around" lens. With an 18-55 you tend to change lenses more (most likely to a 55-200). This is inconvenient and can introduce dust to the sensor.
    Neither lens is particularly great for low light, but the high ISO capability of the D7000 will help make up for that. If it was me, I would buy kit lens with the D7000 and keep the D40 lens on the D40 so you have a complete second camera for a second person to use or for a back up.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I'm considering a D5000, D90 and a D7000. I was originally drawn to the D5000 over the D90 as it seemed to have some additional features I liked - plus the fact that it was about $400 cheaper. Now I have found a D90 kit that includes a 18-55 lens and 70-300 lens (both Nikon VR) for about $700 more than the D5000 with just the 18-55. The 70-300 lens alone is $500+! I already have a 55-200 VR lens, but the fast focus of the 70-300 is tempting. For about $200 over the D90 kit, I can get the D7000 kit (but no 70-300 lens).
    I am leaning towards the D7000 as it has the best of what I like in the D90 (better build, in-camera AF motor) and D5000 (in-camera editing features, better scene modes) and more (higher ISO, lower noise, SDXC compatibility, etc.). I don't think I'll miss the 70-300 lens as I have the 55-200 and am not shooting a lot of sports yet. I could still buy the d5000, but I think I would want to upgrade sooner. If I spend the extra $$$ on the D7000, I will probably use it for twice as long before upgrading.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Thanks for the great review, and thanks everyone too for the helpful comments. I have a D40 and want to be able to take pictures that can be blow up to 30x40 without loss of resolution. With the D40 I can only go to 11x17; any higher and the image pixelates. Wondering if I should upgrade to the D90, the D7000, or as one person suggested, just buy a better lens for my D40?

    ReplyDelete
  74. Hi! Wow a lot of information on here! I can't say thank you enough to all of you with your Nikon knowledge. I am a through and through Nikon lover! I never will own anything else. Currently I have a Nikon D40x. The situation I got put in was this: My Dad wants my Nikon so he went out and bought me a D90. I was already in the process of saving to get another Nikon. I guess money is not an issue at this time. So now I am torn do I keep the D90 or get the D7000. I could really use the help. I shoot weddings, outdoors, and still shots and family photos a lot. This is what I want out of my camera: I want to be able to take pictures in low lighting with ease. I want to be able to take the picture right when I want and not have to wait. I want crisp, clear pictures. I want to be able to shoot sports pictures and have them clear and not blurry. So with that I will take any advice from any Nikon follower out there. I value your opinion and would love to get help with these to options. Thanks for the help! Happy shooting everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  75. i love my d90

    ReplyDelete
  76. To the person 2 posts up who wants to know if he should keep the D90 or get a D7000. If money's not an issue - I would go for the D7000: If money is an issue or if you would prefer to pick up an additional lens with whatever money is left, you could keep the D90 and get say a 70-300 VR zoom for sports or a fast prime lens for low light situations.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I would argue the original poster puts waaay two much emphasis on the sensor and ISO. I would challenge anybody to show me a side by side image in any condition with the D90 that is "better" because of this advantage even at at 100% crop. Unlikely you will use the fastest shutter speed setting in any situation. For most people, I would recommend the highly reviewed D90 (which is now a GREAT price refurbished) paired with a the 18-200mm VR and a 50mm portrait lens. The only way I would upgrade from a D90 to a D7000 is if you're one of those people who "just needs" the newest thing-- or you're spending most of your time doing creative video work and could use some of the camera's advantages.

    If you can still afford the glass and money isn't really an issue, the D7000 should prove to be a slight edge on the D90 and the best amateur DSLR on the market.

    ReplyDelete
  78. HI! I am the gal who was torn do I keep the D90 or go for the D7000. I wanted to say Thank You for all the input you all gave me. I can tell you this: I really don't need the new and latest camera at all. I am not that way. I just want the best camera for me. So it sounds like you all agree on getting the D7000. So if there is anyone else out there who wants to give me any last advice I will take it. I actually have both cameras with me. I had to purchase the D7000 to an extended warranty on the credit card I have. So I have a few days to check them both out. If anyone has tips for me for what to look for I will take them. AGAIN THANK YOU so much for all of you out there! I can say this for sure the D7000 with the 18-200 Nikkor is a lot heavier for sure!
    Thanks! Amy

    ReplyDelete
  79. Hi all This is Kib
    I am planning to buy the Nikon D7000 only for video shoots (for documentaries, and events) not for photography, so do you think this camera is advisable for me specially comparing with the Canon EOS 7D?
    I would love to know also if the D700 Has mic in port?

    Thanks in Advance

    ReplyDelete
  80. Hello New Owner or the D90 So far Love it :) I am new so still have alot to learn my main pics are kids around the house & parks my sons baseball and Hockey ( I hear is the hardest to shoot inside an ice rink) I have the kit lens 18-105 and the 55-300mm vr ( was debating on the 70-300mm vr) still in 14 days was told the two lens were pretty even not one is faster then the other they the same apeature and to same my $$ from getting the 70-300mm vr. I am looking for any advise on what settings I should be set at for hockey games Thanks for the help

    ReplyDelete
  81. I love my D90 I am a professional and was bummed a friend of mine was getting an "upgraded" D90 but let me tell you I believe the D90 is very durable and sturdy! I accidentally dropped it off a table at my daughters birthday party. It still works and I take about 500 images a day 4 days a week so its a beast and keeps on ticking. I agree with the others better glass is the way to go until the next upgrade comes out I think in comparison the D7000 is only slightly better than the D90 for video and ISO. If I didn't have a camera at all I might consider the 7000 but I am perfectly happy with my 90!

    ReplyDelete
  82. Hello ! I have loved reading everyones comments and have found them quite helpful. I currently own a D40 and have had it for almost for three years! I have found a deal on the D7000 with three lenses for £1000 or I could buy a pre owned D90 and buy a new lens for that? I am really un decided on what to buy ! looking for any advice on which I should get :) Thankyou

    ReplyDelete
  83. Thanks for the very informative comparison. One point that I hope you or someone else can clarify: Can the D7000 also use the older Nikon "F" manual focus lenses. I have a few of these lense and this would really make a difference in my decision. I know the D90 cannot use the old lenses.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Hello,

    I am amature photographer interested in Bird and Macro Photography. I am yet to buy my first DSLR.Confused between D90 & D7000.

    I have read some reviews about D7000 backfocus problem. Is that problem resolved or still persist?


    For Bird photography, my concerns areas are Speed & Autofocus, so that I cannot miss the moment.

    1)Best Camera & lens for Macro ?
    2)Best Camera & lens for Bird Photography ?

    I need to your help since I havent used any DSLR as of now, its my first step.


    Regards,
    Tanmay Shende

    ReplyDelete
  85. i want better glass - but who can find it. 85 MM f1.4 SOLD OUT everywhere

    ReplyDelete
  86. I'll stick with my D90, which i have for almost a year now, with 18-105 and 70-300 lenses and that's enough for me, still trying to become a better photographer.I'm not convinced the D7000 will give me better pictures. I considered an upgrade, but what i would like to see on the D7000 is that beautiful articulated display on the D5100, that would be nice.Maybe in the next D90/D7000?

    ReplyDelete
  87. D90 is a versatile camera, I don't think d7k will give me way better picture. I'm into pictures and not videos. don't care about resolution differences. I care more about glasses/lenses and how I shoot and get nice pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  88. "D90 is a versatile camera, I don't think d7k will give me way better picture. I'm into pictures and not videos. don't care about resolution differences. I care more about glasses/lenses and how I shoot and get nice pictures."

    I agree with you, D7000 have more extra function, but not mainly related with IQ
    D90 is enough for my need, I even use D100 with satisfied result

    ReplyDelete
  89. Great review and great comments...... I read them all. It has helped me decide which to buy. The D7000 is for me. It's good to see that the D90 has so many fans and why not it is a great capable camera, if I owned one I would not be upgrading to the D7000 but rather invest in better glass. However, I'm in the market for a new camera and can afford a little extra at the moment, so my decision is to go with the D7000. Looking forward to owning my first Nikon.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Regarding D90 ruggedness, I dropped it while I was sitting on rocky ground and cracked the LCD glass about a year ago. Have used it regularly ever since and everything works fine.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I'm very interested in this discussion as I recently bought a Nikon Coolpix P500 and have since decided to get a real DSLR instead and have been looking into the entry-level models up to D7000. On Snapsort they compare the features of these models, at least on "paper," and the D7000 comes out on top, not surprisingly, I guess, but it also rates the D5100 ahead of the D90. I am happy to read of all the satisfied owners of the D90, because that gives me more faith in the brand and in the capabilities of the cameras. My new P500 is now being repaired for a bad circuit board or some such which they are having trouble diagnosing. The camera would simply lock up making all of the controls inoperable. This gives me pause when considering a used camera that wouldn't have a warranty, such as an older model Nikon. I haven't given up on the brand though this is my first Nikon. In fact when it was working, it was a lot of fun and the controls and menus made sense to me. I love the zoom and the versatility. Having said all that, I am going to stick with the brand and I am now in the market for a Nikon DSLR

    ReplyDelete
  92. I read out all above the comments but still,i am very confused about between D90 & D7000. my budget is not high and want to buy a best camera for me.i love the photography of animals and micro.
    if any one can suggest to me,then please do it.i'll thnax for that.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Everyone's talking about ISO and Pixels etc, which is only half the story ( actually, I think grain adds atmosphere to shots). What I really want to know is how good is the focusing system ?

    I'm on a budget o the D7000 is a hard pill to swallow. I'm considering a D5100 vs D90. The D5100 has the sensor from teh D7000, so will be good, but didn't get the D7000 focusing system.

    How good is the D90 at tracking moving subjects? If i want to focus lock, (and I hate this half pressed button bit) which is best? Can the D90 focus on faces? When taking candid's it has to focus fast and accurately. Which is best - or are they all good ?

    ReplyDelete
  94. The D7000 sounds like a great camera, but I shoot landscape and macro photography in jpeg. Am I going to see a difference in my AutoFocus and noise in my photos of wildlife, landscape and flowers with the d7000 0ver my d90? If price were of no object, I would buy a d7000.

    ReplyDelete
  95. I would recommend you d90+35mm/f.18 AF-S (1000$) - this will be much more usefull then d7000+18-105 (1500$), and note- how much cheaper.

    ReplyDelete
  96. yup yup. better invest with lenses than the body. my D40 is almost dying now and i'm planning to get a D90 (body only) since i've already invested on lenses first instead of an expensive camera body. have you tried combining a D40 & an AF-S DX 17-55mm f/2.8 IF-ED? and yeah am AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 is very handy! newbies be careful, keep on your research.

    ReplyDelete
  97. For any of you guys out there looking for their first DSLR, I would highly recommend to go for a second hand D80. Unless you are buying a DSLR for video (which you shouldn't) or for printing bedroom wall sized posters (which is highly unlikely), the D80 offers more for you too explore than you will probably ever need, at a fraction of the price. The D80 is a very well-built piece of equipment, so even a used one should offer you years of reliable service. Camera makers try to awe buyers with more megapixels and higher ISO numbers, neither of which make any difference to 99% of the pictrues you are ever going to take. Just my two cents...

    ReplyDelete
  98. Try the D90 with the Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 lens. I recently added this to my Nikon 18-200vr zoom which I thought was a great lens but which will now stay in my kit bag. If you are into landscape photography then the quality of the Sigma lens on the D90 has to be seen to be believed. This one change has moved my photography to the next level and confirms all the comments about using better glass, plus this lens will come with me on the next camera upgrade.Using such a wide lens has greatly improved the sharpness and depth of all of my landscape shots and for me was, without a doubt, the best upgrade choice. Hope this helps

    ReplyDelete
  99. I have a D90 and it's amazing what this camera can do. I agree that if you have a D90 already, just invest in better lenses. If I was to upgrade, i'll go for the full frame instead of D7000. Thanks for this review as it made me realise that my d90 is still something worth keeping. :)

    ReplyDelete
  100. It is not the camera that makes a better picture....it is the the one who holds the camera.

    ReplyDelete
  101. I've had the D90 since it came out, terrific camera, outstanding image quality. Don't bother going to D7000, invest in the glass and when you've gained enough experience to shoot the D90 like an expert, if you still want to upgrade go to full frame, D700 for example. Nobody is going to see any difference in image quality between the 90 and 7000. By the way the Nikon 70-300 vr is a really nice lens, go to the zoo, zoom in close on some faces and you'll be amazed, it's not for sports alone. I also have the 24-70, f 2.8 and if I didn't tell you you wouldn't be able to tell the shots apart.

    ReplyDelete
  102. I am a photographer, I shot a wedding as the main photographer with my D80. Well, my assistant showed up with a d7000. At first I thought my photos were worse than his because I was not as great behind the lens, even though we had the same lens. I got my hands on his d7000 and it wasn't him, it was the camera. The pictures were much more vivid and beautiful than my d80, even with the same glass. I am trying to decide whether to upgrade to the D90 or the D7000. I CANT choose.

    ReplyDelete
  103. For me, with cameras it's quite simple. I buy the best I can afford to do what I need and I keep it for 5-7 years, regardless of manufacturer upgrades unless the upgrade is so earth-shattering that you'd have to have it.

    In this case I got the D90 and am very happy with it. Still several years to run on my replacement cycle at which time I'll get the 'release' that is around then, or the one that came out just before and save a load.

    In the meantime, money goes on glass.

    ReplyDelete
  104. I purchased the D3000 a couple of years ago and now I'm ready to upgrade to the D90 or D7000. I don't want to out grow my next camera 2 years from now so should I purchase the D90 or purchase the D7000?

    I have no interest in video or making videos. My only interest is taking pictures, although having the video might come in handy but I doubt I would really use it.

    The next camera I buy I want to have it around for the next 5 to 7 years, or longer. Any advice?

    ReplyDelete
  105. hello?? you should scroll to the top of this blog this is what the entire conversation was about. Buy the D300S

    ReplyDelete
  106. Hello there picturelovers!
    I want to be conviced wether to stay put with my
    D80 wich i kind of like, but I´m into looking for even better sharpness in pictures.

    I have 35-70 mm, 50mm 1,8. 80-200 mm and
    18 - 105 mm DX/VR wich is a superlens,

    I´m mainly shooting portraits and nature.
    Is D 90 or D7000 the best buy,for the best obviusly picture qality?

    ReplyDelete
  107. We are all going pixel mad, real photographers are a dying breed. Get back to basics, learn about photography instead of trying to turn a mediocre picture into a work of art with the computer. I am an auld fart just converting to digital from 35mm film, which I still use. My battered old Nikon D70, with a photographer in control, is producing amazing shots, especially HDR,prints up to A3 are superb..thats with 6 megapixels. Kind Regards..David Burr

    ReplyDelete
  108. The image quality of the D90 is amazing!

    ReplyDelete
  109. ideal buys should be a d90 with 1.4f 50mm + )stock lens + 55~300mm telelphoto) or (18-200mm al rounder) for all amateur + semi pro use----add lenses as per need and should be a great pack with a tripod + good flash + 2-3 mem cards and a uv filter

    ReplyDelete
  110. Hi every one
    Please let me get rid of my nightmare which is: d90 or d7000; I want to invest in some good lenses like 24-70 f2.8., 105 macro but still did not decide which camera should I go for as I am not sure if using good lens with d7000 would make a big difference plus I am not sure if these lenses are not too good for d90??? probably not but just need an advice, will d90 perform worse with above lenses than d7000?

    ReplyDelete
  111. I have a D90, and just got another camera, D70s ,for a song. The D70 is one of the most overlooked cameras, the CCD sensor takes fantastic pictures. Yes I know it is only 6 Mpix, so you have to do the job out there, not at the computer. Back to basics !

    ReplyDelete
  112. Amazing how a key differentiator of D90 vs D300 and D7000 doesn't appear here : autofocus fine tuning. And this is a full feature that affects IQ, not a mere marginal improvement.
    This alone will have me upgrade, as I can't stand my D90 slight backfocus using fast glass.

    ReplyDelete
  113. I am a theater photographer. I currently have a D90...which I have loved. My subjects are always moving and mostly under lower light. I'm I have a difficult time with shooting at the highest iso without it being grainy or blurry. Do you advise me to move in this direction due to the faster shutter speed and higher iso opportunity?? Someone advised me against this and said that I would be fine with the D5100, but everything I'm reading says that is a lower body than the d90. Am I reading this correctly?

    ReplyDelete
  114. @cfpresley12: Yeah in some areas. You need better lenses (f2.8 or <f2.8 ) for low light shots. There are many DSLR cameras but u should know that high MPixels create more noise in small size sensors. If u r using Full frame sensor (36m with reference to film )with good lenses, u r good to go.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I have read most of the posts here and did not see any comments on drawbacks of D7k compared with D90 technically, except the price. Let me ask a question: if these two cams are under the same price, which one would you buy? Would there be any reason that prevents you from picking the newer D7k?

    I am a newbie but with no budget issue. I just need a good DX camera now REGARDLESS the price. Also since I am a newbie I don't want to go too far with an FX one. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Thanks buddy. Nice comparison, indeed D7000 is better but not enuf that i will upgrade my D90. If I would have been buying a new i would have went for D7000. My D90 is almost 2 years old and still clicking tremondous photographs. I do edit my pics in lightroom.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Wow, so much information! I am about to buy my first Digital SLR and have been told the D90 is now superceded. I have used a D90 and was very happy with it. I shoot mainly surfing ( family, not for a living! ), do I go ahead and buy a D90 with a dual lens combo or spend a bit more on the 7000? Rapid burst is important and ability to print if the picture is good enough. I would welcome any advice :)

    ReplyDelete