
Today I saw a video in DigitalRev YouTube channel that compared the Nikon D7000 vs Canon 60D. A few days ago I did a comparison between the Nikon D7000 vs. Canon 7D. In my opinion, the Nikon D7000 can be easily compared with the 7D in terms of features and built quality. From what I can see, people just don't know where to categorize this camera. I still don't know if the Canon 60D is an upgrade from the 50D or the 550D. I can understand why DigitalRev did a D7000 vs 7D comparison and not because both of them have the number 7 in their model number.
Before the Nikon D7000 announced, I was quite sure that Canon has the edge when it comes to video. Now that Nikon has improved the video on the D7000, I think that it is no longer a very hard decision choosing between the two. The 60D has an articulating screen, and for video I think that it's very useful. Both the Nikon D7000 and the Canon EOS 60D has been reviewed on several websites. The Nikon D7000 has gotten really good reviews and it seems that in terms of performance, features and image quality, the D7000 is a great choice for advanced photographers.
The problem starts when you already have the 550D or the 50D and want to upgrade. I actually don't see a real reason why people should upgrade to the 60D. The Canon 7D, though it costs more than the 60D, seems like the right upgrading path. I've checked the street prices of the Canon EOS 60D, Nikon D7000 and Canon EOS 7D. The 60D costs around $830, Nikon D7000 street price is around $1700 (also I found it for $1200 somewhere) and the Canon 7D price is around $1400. As you can see, there is a difference between the 60D and the D7000. The Nikon D7000 is prices over the Canon 7D. It looks like the D7000 wasn't meant to compete against future 50D replacement, but directly compete against Canon's successful DSLR, the 7D.
When the D7000 came out, I though that it supposed to replace the Nikon D90. From what I've read on photography websites, the Nikon d7000 is a new addition to Nikon's DSLR lineup and wasn't supposed to replace the D90. This is exactly what Canon did with the EOS 7D. The 7D is a new addition to Canon's EOS lineup and is not supposed to replace the 50D. So the 60D is actually a replacement to the 50D. Honestly, I am not 100% percent sure whether the 60D replace the 50D and if the D7000 is or not a replacement for the D90. If you don know, please comment.
If the 60D is a replacement for the 50D, why Canon has decided to use a plastic body instead of the same Magnesium-alloy body found on the 50D? I didn't fund any answer for that, but it's really weird don't you think. Furthermore, if the D7000 doesn't replace the D90, we probably should see a new DSLR that does replace it.
D7000, 7D and the 60D, all have 1080p HD movie recording. The Nikon D7000 support ISO 25600 while the Canon's only goes up to ISO 6400. The resolution difference between the Nikon D7000 (16.2MP) vs Canon 60d (18.0MP) is not significant at all. If you debate between the Canon 60D vs Nikon D7000, you should first look at the price tag. The Canon 60D is much cheaper, almost two times cheaper than the D7000!
Usually reviewers don't compare cameras with such a huge price margin difference.
Let's see a short feature comparison:
| Canon 60D | Nikon D7000 | Canon EOS 7D | |
| Resolution | 18.0 MP | 16.2 MP | 18.0 MP |
| Sensor size | 22.3 x 14.9 mm (1.6x crop factor) | 23.1 x 15.4 mm (1.5x crop factor) | 22.3 x 14.9 mm (1.6x crop factor) |
| Pixel density | 5.4 MP/cm² | 4.6 MP/cm² | 5.4 MP/cm² |
| ISO | 100-12800 | 100-25600 | 100-12800 |
| HD Video (max) | 1080p @ 30/25/24 fps | 1080p @ 24 fps | 1080p @ 30/25/24 fps |
| Screen resolution | 1,040,000 dots | 921,000 dots | 920,000 dots |
| Weight | 755 g | 780 g | 860 g |
| Burst mode | 5.3 fps | 6 fps | 8 fps |
| Viewfinder | 96% coverage, 0.95x magnification | 100% coverage, 0.94x magnification | 100% coverage, 1.0x magnification |
| AF points | 9 focus points | 39 focus points | 19 focus points |
| Body construction | Plastic | Partial Magnesium alloy with weather sealing | Magnesium alloy with weather sealing |
By going through the specs above, we can see that the Nikon D7000 has the lead when it comes to pixel density, ISO levels and AF system. Both the Canon 7D and the 60D have more video frame rate selection, while the D7000 only shoots 1080p at 24 frames per second. The 60D also employs a higher pixel count LCD screen with 1,040,000 dots, but the difference in real use is not huge. The Canon 7D sports higher continuous shooting with eight fps and gives 100% coverage with 1.0x magnification.
So in favor of the Canon EOS 60D are a large selection of frame rates in video recording and a larger LCD resolution. If we ignore the slight edge of the LCD resolution, the 60D has a slight edge in pixel count and more flexible movie recording functionality. So for videos, the Canon 60D has the edge if you want to shoot movie clips other than 24 fps. Considering that the 60D has a plastic body compared to the partial D7000 magnesium-alloy body, the 60D is probably less advanced camera then the D7000 for still photography.
One more thing that I want to add regarding the video. The 60D also offers 50 and 60fps in 720p, while the Nikon D7000 supports 24/25/30fps in 720p.
So let's sum things up...
Resolution
In terms of resolution, their isn't any huge difference between them. Both the 7D and the 60D has the same 18MP resolution, while the D7000 has 16.2MP. Here is a maximum pixel resolution comparison:- Canon EOS 60D - 5184 x 3456
- Nikon D7000 - 4928 x 3264
- Canon EOS 7D - 5184 x 3456
Body Construction & Ergonomics
This is where there are real differences. The Canon 60D is built upon a plastic chassis. The Canon 7D has a full magnesium alloy body construction The Nikon D7000 is partially magnesium-alloy. I didn't have a change to hold all of them in my hands, but according to what I've read on reviews and hands-on previews, the Canon 7D feel much better and durable in the hands, the D7000 second and the 60D feels plasticy. By saying plasticy I don't mean cheap. The 60D feels also good in the hands and it is well built, but not at the same standards as the D7000 or the 7D.Many 50D owners will be very disappointed when they realized that the Canon EOS 60D construction is made of plastic. The 50D was constructed with magnesium alloy body, so this is actually a downgrade in this respect. If you want to best weather sealed and durable body, the 7D is probably the best pick.
Regarding the ergonomics, you will probably need to judge it yourself. Go to the camera store and hold all of them in your hands, or at least the ones that you intend to buy. Again, from what I've read on the hands-on reviews, both the Nikon D7000 and the Canon EOS 7D are very comfortable, while the 60D at the second place.
ISO Performance
We probably still need to wait for more reviews to get to a final conclusion. For now, it seems that the Nikon D7000 has the edge. I've seen amazing low-noise images taken with the D7000 at ISO 3200 and 6400. I've checked dpreview Canon 60D review, and on the noise tests page 11, you can see that in RAW ACR NR Off, the Canon 60D noise is more subtle, though tend to suffer from more chroma noise. Overall, I was very impressed to see the noise results from the 60D, very impressive indeed. When it comes to ISO performance, you just can't go wrong with either. Furthermore, 50D owners might upgrade to the 60D if they want better low-noise performance. Don't forget that the Nikon can climb up to ISO 25600, while the 7D and the 60D "only" offers 12800 ISO maximum sensitivity. I've also checked come high ISO 7D sample images and the D7000 and the 7D are equally good.Dpreview has an excellent tool called "Studio comparison widget". This widget is embedded in every article. Using this tool you can easily compare the JPEG image quality between different cameras. I used this tool to compare the image quality between the Canon 60D vs Nikon D7000 vs Canon 7D. In ISO 1600, all of them are equally good. It seems that the image is a bit sharper on the Canon's compare to the Nikon. At ISO 3200 you can see where the Nikon D7000 shines. The D7000 has produce a slightly cleaner image compares to the Canon's. At ISO 6400, the Nikon shows a cleaner image BUT you can see blue and purple chrome noise patterns in several areas of the image. I can't really point on a winner here, but the D7000 noise performance is excellent.
Only when you compare those three cameras against the Nikon D3S (full frame), you can see that the Nikon D3S produce a MUCH cleaner image, absolutely jaw dropping image quality at 128000, just WOW!
Burst Mode
Fast continuous shooting is very important for sports photography. In this section , the Canon EOS 7D has the edge with 8 frames per second continuous shooting speed. The Canon 60D and the Nikon D7000 both offer a fast burst rate, but the D7000 leads with a 0.7 fps advantage (5.3fps vs. 6fps). Maybe in filled testing they might perform the same. Even so, that speed can be good enough for some fast action photographers. To enjoy the maximum burst speed, make sure you get a fast memory card. If you want the fastest digital SLR from the three, the Canon 7D will satisfy even the most enthusiast sports photographer.If your are a hobbyist photographer with a tight budget, the 60D is an very good choice for fast action shooting as well.HD Movie Clips
I don't know why Nikon not opted to a larger selection of frame rate speeds in 1080p like Canon. The good think is that with the new Nikon D7000 DSLR you can shoot videos in 1080p, compared to 720p on the Nikon D90. 24 fps is a very popular frame rate among cinematographers, and if you usually shoot videos in 24p, it shouldn't bother you. Nikon can also come up with a firmware upgrade that will let D7000 owners to shoot in 30 and 25 too. I don't know if Nikon will release a firmware that will do that, because if it wanted to, it would have done it when it released the camera to the market. Canon has done it before with the Canon 5D Mark II, so maybe Nikon will do it too. D7000 (video samples here, and more D7000 videos here ), 60D and the 7D, all supports 1080p and 720p movie clips recording. If you shoot many HD videos, you might find the 720p 50/60fps option quite attractive.Nikon D7000 vs Canon EOS 60D Comparison video:
Canon EOS 60D vs 7D Comparison video:
AF System
Nikon D7000 sports 39 focus points, while the 7D 19 focus points and the 60D has only 9 focus points (cross type). In theory, the Nikon suppose to top the 7D and the 60D without blinking. After watching some video reviews and reading a little bit, the 7D AF performance is excellent, as good as the D7000 from what I've read.Conclusion
Taking all the above into consideration, I think that the 60D is a good upgrade over the 50D and the 550D. The Nikon D7000 is a better camera to the 60D when it comes to body construction, AF system (Nikon used a brand new AF system with the D7000), image quality, speed and functionality. The Nikon D7000 is a straight competitor with the Canon EOS 7D. Both are amazing mid-range DSLRs that can produce amazing images, even at high ISO levels. It is really tempting not to jump to the Canon 5D Mark II on the Canon or to the Nikon D700 full frame cameras. If I had to choose between the three, I would probably be debating between the 7D vs D7000, not the 60D. I hope this article help you get a more detailed view of the pros and cons for each camera and how they compare one against each other.To purchase the Canon 60D from Amazon click here
If you are searching to buy a full frame camera, don't forget to read my comparison article about Sony A850 vs Canon 5D Mark II vs Nikon D700. If you have a tight budget, you should also consider the Nikon D3100 and see how it compares to the D7000. The Sony A55 is also an excellent camera and even features 10fps. Check my Sony A55 vs Sigma SD1 vs Nikon D7000 for further information.

I am a trigger-happy person and I love the D7000.Overall this is a fantastic camera for the price and probably the last DX sensor camera I will need for a long time.
ReplyDeleteFor more info visit:
http://hubpages.com/hub/Nikon-D-7000
It seems that the Nikon D7000 is getting very popular in a very short time. My friend has decided to buy the D7000 over the Canon EOS 7D (which he really wanted prior to the announcement of the D7000). I think that this is the best ASP-C digital SLR on the market today, in an advanced-amateur perspective. The only place to go from there is buying the Nikon D700 or its replacement, the D800.
ReplyDeleteI really like Canon EOS 7D than other one due to Canon is the best choice at this time. Tks!!!
ReplyDeleteJust a thought, But when looking at the comaprison video, surely it would be difficult to compare the two unless they had the exact equivilent quality of lenses on, ie one canon lens on an exact par (or as close as) as a nikkor lense. If you had a superb bit of glass on either surely they would be very similar.
ReplyDeletethink I might get a d7000
Joe
if upgrading aren't some of the canon lenses compadible with a cannon upgrade? than might play a role when upgrading from one to another.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't know though I shoot nikon, but its a thought
I bought the 60D as a backup to my 5D. Cheaper in feel and especially the CLACK that is the shutter sound but overall a pleasure to use. Best points are the big viewfinder with clear info, the very clear LCD that articulates and the grip that means you can easily hang the camera from your fingers making it a great walk around camera. Image quality is absolutely fine. I looked through a friends D7000 and the viewfinder was much smaller. Not so impressive on that score. Go for a 5D/D700 for low light (5D for landscape), a 7D for action, a 60D or D7000 as a general use camera.
ReplyDeleteI would like to buy Nikon D7000 but question is; does it accept Canon lenses?
ReplyDeleteIt is the lenses that keeps me glued to Canon. Otherwise I would have migrated to Nikon for their vastly superior bodies.
Canon bodies are anything but excellent.
which body were you referring to, or all Canon bodies in general?
DeleteOh how I love to read 'reviews' and 'comparisons' from people who can download a spec sheet.. -.-
ReplyDeleteI currently own both the 60D and D7000 because I have not decided which to return, and it has become obvious that few 'review' sites have physically touched these cameras.
Whether or not anyone can validate the purchase of these three cameras, you need to base your evaluation on real world usage, not paper performance. Therefore I felt the need to technically address the primary 'winning' points that most spec-sheet review sites seem to regurgitate in favor of the D7000. Please excuse me for not covering all the hollow specifications.
Build quality: Nikon owners should be offended by the D7000 and its price tag. The camera has a paper thin Magnesium shield on the top and across the back holding the LCD panel - the remainder of the camera is nothing but plastic. (the whole thing, including what is holding the guts of the camera, and it has no more weather sealing than the D90)
Sure, the skin of the 60D is essentially fiberglass - but it has a structurally superior (compared to D7000) aluminum chassis under its skin holding all the expensive parts. (takes me back to my T90 days, that camera was a brick)
7D? is a work of Magnesium art. Outside of the battery compartment every other external surface is metal - top, bottom, sides, front.. To compare either of these two cameras to the 7D is futile, and ignorant.
As for the AF systems: You cannot read a spec sheet and announce 'this is better than that'.. In the real world (and you can find this on dozens of real review sites) the AF system in the D7000 provides no significant benefit. It does not work faster, nor more accurately than the 19-point (full cross type) AF system in the 7D. As a matter of tested fact, it does not always perform better than the 9-point system used in other cameras. You can consider it marketing hype by Nikon to make their owners feel all warm and fuzzy (it does out perform several other Nikon models though).
Drive modes: If continuous shooting speed is of benefit to you, and you have your D7000 in your hand, then you better hope you pick the right ~3-seconds to start shooting. The D7000 can (burst) 6fps for ~20 frames, then spends the next 15 seconds writing - and that is only if you stop shooting, if you continue shooting beyond the ~3 second burst you get a wondrous ~2fps and only in spurts. The 7D (8fps, ~125 frames, ~15 seconds). The 60D (5.3fps, ~58 frames, ~11 seconds). All cameras set to JPG(fine).
Sensitivity: Yes, let us not forget the glorious ISO performance of the D7000 that makes it market better than its competition! All three cameras present wonderfully capable high ISO performance, especially in comparison to previous generations. To address the super high ISO selling points of the D7000 however, I will simply summarize it thustly.. Do we really spend thousands of dollars in equipment to spend an hour in post processing hoping to yield a questionably identifiable 3x5 print? 12800/25600 ISO? Cheers to Nikon for more warm and fuzzy spec-sheet fluff.
The only thing that the D7000 has going for it in the real world, by comparison, is its sensor - which is very good. So much so that if pursuing the best image quality under $2500 is your thing, then the D7000 is your number one choice among the Nikon offerings.
The truth: Much to the dismay of Nikon, and the D7000 owners who over paid against competitive offerings, the D7000 in this comparison really does fall closer to the 60D and is over powered by the 7D. While it may out pace the 60D in areas, it is not on the redundantly hyped points covered above.
To anonymous Feb 13, 2011 10.48pm
ReplyDeleteI agree with ur points. Went out to get a D7000 after hearing all the hype. Always wanted a Nikon as my 1st dslr.
Was asked to try out 60D. Tried it reluctantly but realized the ergonomics is way better immediately, opposite to all the praises lavished on Nikons' grip in reviews.
Got the 60D since:-
-way better ergonomics. 60D grip curves are actually modelled to my hand, unlike D7K which requires some uncomfortable contortion of my fingers to shoot & no place to put my thumb. I can also hang 60D on my fingers in-between shootings, D7k feels more unsecure. Don't know why D7K keeps getting glowing reviews of the grip.
-small lcd display correspond to function button placement. No need to search the display when changing ISO, drive etc. Display is just below the button.
- can't tell the difference between mag-alloy and fibreglass body.
- are we so anal to compare 5.3 fps vs 6 fps? different story if its 4 vs 10. Anyway 60D sustains for much longer. This is more important I think.
-cheaper. Both cameras are bout the same class, so this tranlates to a better value for me (60D)
-no use for dual sd slots. Been using 'pro-sumers' (read:single sd slot) with no issues. Just use a larger card if I need more space.
Think the only thing going for D7K is the better high ISO performance which I may miss. But 60D is also very good & miles ahead of its predecessor 50D.
Realized Nikons are usually superior on paper and much hyped up everytime by reviews where Canons' introduced features are usually more catered to actual use. All said, I'm still a fan of Nikon dslr (but not their PnS)& hope
they can implement/ 'hype up' features more for actual use and less on technical superiority which don't always tranlates to user-friendliness.
..I apologize if I came off like a Canon 'fanboy' or anything, I am just very direct. I actually own both Nikon and Canon bodies - not including the 60D and D7000, I have a 5D, 7D, 40D - D300, D40, and D90.
ReplyDeleteI was actually looking forward to the D7000 offering a good mix of my three Nikon bodies in a lighter smaller package than the D300. To a small extent it does offer that, but being within ~$200 of the 7D and D300s it is no where close to being in the same class as those two bodies. Nikon is just gouging its customers to help fund this summers new model. (I'm hoping it is a D700x/s so it will lower the cost of the current D700 =P)
When I assess a camera it is in the field (literally) and for that type of shooting I would recommend a weather aware Canon body every day of the week (you can still get the 50D new) primarily to go with the much better grade of zoom/telephoto glass. The 60D is a good compromise if you are on a budget, and it holds up well to normal 'caught in the rain' field conditions - just don't stand there shooting like it is waterproof.
Now I am not saying that Nikon can't compete in the field, but every time I take my D300 out it comes back looking like I purposely tried to camouflage it - grass hanging off the rubber flaps, grit built up in every crevice and corner.. I feel it just has too many square surfaces and angles to be what I would consider a field camera. I shoot the Nikon's a little closer to, and in, the studio. While I do not feel the Nikon bodies have any significant physical capabilities in color saturation than I can tweak out of the Canon bodies, they just seem to produce more appealing skin tones for portrait work - at least from the clients perspective.
With those preferences/practices in mind, if I had a friend or client interested in getting a good all purpose Nikon camera I would recommend the D90 without a second thought. You can even get the D90 with the same kit glass, and for about $500 less than the D7000 - at this stage the D7000 is just too much marketing and not enough camera for the price.
I have been using Nikon D80 for 5 years but 2 days ago switched to Canon 7D. Why?...The results with Canon was better than Nikon.If you like boosted colors like green green grass or blue blue blue sky,get a Canon.Trust me there is a big difference between Canons and Nikons.
ReplyDeleteIf you like to adjust the colors on computer,then get a Nikon.Ignore the technical details.
When we start shooting as good as Ansel Adams,then technical details will be important.
Look at the pics.of the pros that you like and make up your mind.
It is the photographer shooting the pics.Camera is just an instrument.
Ignore the brands and enjoy your photos folks.
The D7000 is only $100 more than the 60D not twice as much. To the self identified Canon fanboy who owns almost every Canon and Nikon (Hmmm), I agree that the review was a spec sheet comparo so maybe you should have suggested people go out and try out the cameras and decide for themselves. I have and am sure that most will come to the conclusion that the D7000 is far superior.
ReplyDeleteD7000 is better in actual usage in still pictures. I have been using Canon but Nikon lenses are really good. Nikon focuses on their Cameras and medical scopes and Canon more on videos which is excellent.
ReplyDeletei just replace my D7000/18-105vr after 3 week of use,used before that D90, and before D80, with a canon 60D/15-85is, i use camera only for photo not video, and all i can say is WOW, what a difference, 60D is better in every aspect, leave snoob commentary D7000 is not king of the univers... i don't give a shit if one body is metal or plastic, it will do the job anyway, D90 is all cheap plastic and before D7000 come out was the best nikon camera out there, if canon 60D is plastic shit then nikon D90 is more plastic shit and a crappy bad camera.
ReplyDeleteMaybe if you used a comparable lens like the 16-85 vr on the Nikon you would've kept the D7000. Of course there's a big difference. You're comparing a kit lens to a higher quality lens. Funny how all the Canon fanboys have had a truckload of Nikon cameras before they miraculously changed to Canon. Talk about your shit.
DeleteCanon EOS 60D com certeza. Melhor custo benefÃcio.
ReplyDeleteDebating what's better FORD or CHEVY ??
ReplyDeleteWould't be nice to have Canon vs Nikon Factory Pro argue this topic?
so we could see, what is the real difference? I am still confused what to buy? and no one is helping.
When someone says "WOW when I switched from this brand to this brand and no my pictures are so much better" he is nothing more than an amateur. Having said that, you cant go wrong if you decide to go Canon or Nikon route. All your considerations should be based on lens offerings not camera offerings. Because lenses is what produces good image quality, not the sensor. If the camera you bought was kitted with a cheap lens, well the results are not going to be great either. But please do yourself a favor and ignore the trolls who state "When I moved from this brand to this brand...the Images were so much better". Those guys are gear heads and not photographers. Invest into lenses, invest into yourself learning photography, and invest in post processing your photos. It is also a myth that one brand produces better images straight out of the camera. It is all in the workflow. It is all in the eye of the beholder. There are too many people like frogs jumping back and forth from Nikon to Canon and back dont be one of those.
ReplyDeletedepending on what camera body you have if its d90 or 50d or 550d i would just invest in a better lens and keep the body. Body will always change but your lens are your work-horse and can be with you for a very long period of time...
ReplyDeletejust my 2 cents...
I am new to dslr photography and have to say that I find the comments posted on these so called "helpful" websites rather rude at times. You can get your point across without making someone else feel like an idiot. That being said I have tried both the 60d, Nikon D7000 and 7d. The Nikon cameras are a little slower to focus, for me anyway. Other than that I think they are pretty great. I like the 7d better for performance, but I think the 60d is a great compromise in it's price range. The only thing that really concerns me about it is the body. Over time, I think it could get a little beat up. I wish Canon had taken that into consideration.
ReplyDelete60D have plastic body...but it still got the weather sealing. I got one and it feels robust. Still new to DSLR world though...
ReplyDeleteFor videos, go for 60D. For anything else go for either Canon 7D or Nikon d7000. They're all great cameras.
ReplyDeleteIm stepping up from a Sony DSC-F717 and cant make up my mind on which DSLR to invest in. My Sony has been a fantastic camera and I feel that I've learned enough to move on but should I focus on more?
ReplyDeleteConcerns:
1. 100 % viewfinder vs. 96%. It really does make a difference. I have an old 10D too and it sucks to only get part of the final image.
2. Post production... I am a graphic artist and very confident with photo editing tools but the Canon 60D looks as if it puts out a nicer looking image straight from the camera. The Nikon images seem washed out and under saturated. Although, I've read that the Nikon images stand up better to image processing... hmm.
3: Video... I don't take a lot of video but it is an interest that I would like to develop. They are both great but the Canon is clearly leading the way.
4: Controls... I have played with both in the stores and although the Canon 60D feels better to hold and think about hiking and traveling with, the controls on the Nikon seem better placed and make more sense. I'm sure I'd learn the camera I chose and not have it be a concern, but...
5. Lenses... I am baffled by the lens factor. Canon seems to have more reasonably priced lenses and they produce great results. The Nikon Lenses are more expensive but somehow edge canon out with their offerings.
I am really a beginner that has a good eye. Does the 60D make more sense or should I get use to post processing all my photos to make them look great?
Help!
Love these comments that say one camera is so much better than the other. At the end of the day, either one is capable of great images. If you can't make one or the other perform, then you need to blame your poor skills and lack of understanding over the gear. The main difference between these cameras is the ergonomics. I have always thought that Nikon puts a little more into real world ergonomics. Try turning the 7D on with one hand and taking one of those unexpected shots. It can't be done. The dials on the Canon are also more difficult to use than the Nikon when the camera is against your face. To me, these are poor decisions that Canon does not change from model to model, but again, it boils down to what you deem important. So forget the image quality, as you are splitting hairs between these two cameras. Get out and hold one in a camera shop or rent each one for a day and get out for some real world shooting. You people that state Nikon or Canon sucks tells me that you don't use the settings of your camera, and might as well save the money for a high end P&S. Good luck with that.
ReplyDeleteA lot of these posts are hilarious. Bottom line: Great images are far more a function of the skills of the photographer than the camera, and both Nikon and Canon make great cameras. They both make even better lenses. The best thing to do is to try all three of these cameras (Canon 60D, 7D, and Nikon D7000), and see what feels best to you. Then get a good lens (even a 50mm 1.8, inexpensive as it is, can take phenomenal images on any of these 3 bodies), and most importantly: once you make a choice, stop reading silly forums, stop worrying whether or not you made the right choice, and go out and TAKE PICTURES! For what it's worth, I own the 7D and have also used the 60D. The cameras both use the same sensor, and both take great images. For a couple of reasons predicated solely on the type of photography I enjoy, I prefer the 7D. BUT... the 60D is an excellent camera and even better value since it's about 40% less expensive than the 7D. If you're on a budget, a 60D with a great lens would be a smarter buy than a 7D with a kit lens. Forget the prosumer vs. professional vs. amateur....that's all marketing BS. Try them all out, make a decision and then go try to realize the potential of any of the 3 cameras mentioned. They're all so much better than almost any camera at any price from just a generation ago that the basis of most of these comments are meaningless. Enjoy your camera. Don't worry about your decision. Good luck...
ReplyDeleteRegarding the post about "Try turning the 7D on with one hand and taking one of those unexpected shots. It can't be done." I beg to differ. The 7D's on/off switch is on the top of the camera (a great improvement over the horrendous placement of the switch on the 5Dm2 and 50D), and yes, it's on the left top side, not the right as on the D7000. The solution? If you're out taking pics, why would u turn off the 7D? No need to continuously turn it on and off. If left on the camera will automatically sleep if not in use, but comes back on pretty much instantly (faster than you could flip the on/off switch of the D7000 with one hand, as commented). The battery of the 7D is phenomenal, and will last a lot longer than you will on a single charge. FYI.
ReplyDeleteI bought the Nikon D7000 last week and i am extremely happy with it.its fast and feels solid ,a little smaller than my friends D300s but even he admited that the D7000 has something better in picture quality.the dual card feature is fantastic i use it for back up 2 16 GB cards for peace of mind.
ReplyDeletei love my d7000. a friend of mine owns a 60d and her images more or less look like mine. i honestly, i prefer the images from my camera, but it could be that she is not a very talented photographer. i don't know how anyone could say d7000 images are unsaturated, i find them to be almost too punchy at times, but thank god for picture controls..as you can fine tune them how you would like. i will say canon color might be a tad more accurate, but the d7000 is narrowing that gap. not to mention the high iso and low light functions of the d7000 are far superior to the canon.. iso 6400 on my d7000 looks much better than my friends 60d on 3200. as other's have said, you CANNOT go wrong with either system. i believe true photography enthusiasts tend towards nikon, while techies stray toward canon.
ReplyDeleteNow that the iPhone 4S is announced I'm excited because of it's 8 megapixel camera built in. I can use that as my everyday point and shoot camera and have been looking at getting a nice DSLR. I've had nothing but Canons in the past and I was looking at the 60D but I'm seeing overall better reviews for the Nikon D7000. I'm totally confused and I have Canon Lenses left over from my old Canon EOS days. Do those work on the Canon 60D? If so would the advice be to stick to the Canon or would you go with a Nikon?
ReplyDeleteAnother question is would you wait until an upgrade to the Canon 60D or Nikon D7000 are avail? I don't even know when that would be. I'm going on a trip to France and Germany mid December and would love to take the nice camera along this time. I've been taking my Canon G9 and later the Canon G10. So having a DSLR would be quite nice this time. What would anyone do?
Bottom Line: Both are similar; look at the price! Go to Costco.com; both are there. Costco has a 90-day return policy. Try out both. If you still are not sure, then look at the reviews of the kit lenses for both. After that, buy the body you like; then shop separately for the lens.
ReplyDeleteAlright, after all the reviews I did for which camera to purchase I got the Nikon D7000! So far I'm totally impressed. The only thing is it's so happy! I travel to Europe every December for a month. Well France mostly but this year to Germany and Czech Republic as well and I normally take my Canon G10 but this year it will be my Nikon D7000 and I already feel that it's a bit heavy. It's just something I will have to get used to.
ReplyDeleteOverall I'm very happy with the quality with the Nikon D7000. I just can't wait to take all the awesome winter pics!
These are my comments on the differences between Nikon D7000 and Canon 7D. Note that only the differences are mentioned here, leaving out similarities.
ReplyDeleteAuto Focus System: 7D auto-focuses quicker compared to D7000; however, D7000 has 39 AF points compared to 7D's 19.
Battery Life: D7000's last longer than 7D's.
Build Quality: 7D has a full alloy-interior, compared to D7000's top and back only.
Burst Speed: 7D sports a higher burst rate (8fps, 14-bit).
Image Processor: 7D has dual Digic-IV processor, compared to D7000's single Expeed II.
Image Quality: D7000's is sharper, with less noise in higher ISOs.
In-hand Feel: 7D has a better grip feel, but it is bigger in size and weights more.
Internal Buffer: 7D has a bigger buffer space which helps shooting in burst mode or shooting with slower memory cards.
Low-light Performance: At ISOs higher than 800 D7000 shows less noise than 7D.
Sensor: With D7000's slightly bigger sensor (crop factor of 1.5 vs 1.6) you get slightly wider view of things.
Storage: D7000's dual SD card is both convenient and cost-effective, compared to 7D's CF card.
User Controls: D7000's button and menu layout are better.
Video: 7D triumphs in this regard with all the options of frame rates, manual control; however for longer shoots, there are reported cases of auto shutting down due to sensor overheating.
Price: B&H, for example, is selling (body-only) D7000 for $1299.00 and 7D for $1399.95.
7D vs d7000's = 7d has a large selection of great "L" lenses.
ReplyDeleteThats why i love 7d
d7000 for good quality pic and low light performance
ReplyDelete7d for video and bracket shots
Body construction is important if your usage environment is hostile. Otherwise plastic is fine.
Define what's importance to you and pick the right camera.
Ultimately the real limiter will always be the glass. Canon wins hands down on this front.
ReplyDelete