In this article I will be comparing the Nikon D5100 vs Canon Rebel T3i advanced entry-level digital SLR cameras. The Nikon D5100 is one of those cameras that really stands out from the crowd. It's one of Nikon's entry-level d-slr cameras that combines the crème de la crème features in an affordable price. You mind find yourself temped to pick up a more expensive Nikon camera, but for many of you, the D5100 can be the perfect camera to purchase in 2011.
Overview
At this time of year, we are waiting for the announcement of three new Nikon D-SLR cameras: Nikon D400 (D300s replacement), D800 (D700 replacement) and the D4 (D3s replacement). We can expect those cameras to be announce later this year. Beginner to photography and Nikon D5000 owners don't have to wait any longer. The Nikon D5100 is, most probably, the best option you have right now. Canon has already announced the T3i (600D) and the T3 (1100D), so you can compare those cameras and decide which one fits you best.In this article I wanted to compare the Nikon D5100 vs Canon T3i (600D), as those cameras are direct competitors. The Canon T3 (1100D) is Canon's basic entry-level digital SLR camera that compete against the Nikon D3100. I've already made a comparison review that compared the Canon T3 vs Nikon D3100. Even so, this comparison blog post was made before Nikon announced the D5100, so it's a good time to compare the T3i/600D against the newly announced D5100. I think it will be a fair comparison, as many of your are probably debating between those two cameras, So Let's start!
Feature Comparison Table
Let's start with a Canon 600D vs Nikon D5100 feature comparison table and we'll continue discussing both camera's feature later on.| Feature | Canon T3i (600D/Kiss X5) | Nikon D5100 |
| Announced |  |  |
| Announced | February 7, 2011 | April 5, 2011 |
| Sensor Resolution (effective) | 18.0-megapixel | 16.2-megapixel |
| Sensor size | 22.3x14.9 mm 1.6x (focal length multiplier) | 23.6x15.7 mm 1.5x (focal length multiplier) |
| ISO sensitivity | 100-6400 (native) 12800 (expanded) | 100-6400 (native) 12800, 25600 (expanded) |
| LCD | 3-inch 1,040,000 dot Articulated | 3-inch 921,000 dot Articulated |
| Viewfinder | Pentamirror Coverage: 95% Magnification: 0.85% | Pentamirror Coverage: 95% Magnification: 0.78% |
| Shutter speed | 30sec - 1/4000sec | 30sec - 1/4000sec |
| Built-in Flash | Yes (13m) | Yes (12m) |
| Continuous shooting | 3.7fps | 4fps |
| HD movie clips | 1080p @ 30/25/24fps 720p @ 60/50fps Max. recording time: 1080p 12 min. 720p 12 min. VGA 24 min. | 1080p @ 30/25/24fps 720p @ 30/25/24fps Max. recording time: 20min (approx.) - Didn't find detailed info. |
| Battery life | 440 (CIPA) | 660 (CIPA) |
| Weight (with batteries) | 570 g | 560 g |
| Size | 133 x 100 x 80 mm | 128 x 97 x 79 mm |
| External microphone mini jack | Yes (3.5mm) | Yes (3.5mm) |
| Memory cards | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC |
| Processor | Digic 4 | Expeed 2 |
| AE Bracketing | ±2 (3 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps) | ±2 (3 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps) |
As you can see from the above T3i vs D5100 specs comparison table, every camera has its strength in different areas. The Nikon D5100 has a larger sensor (just a bit) ans lower resolution. That leads to less crowded pixel and theoretically should lead to better low light performance.
High ISO Performance & Image Quality
We can also see a hint for that considering the fact that the D5100 has a ISO25600, while the Canon 600D/T3i/Kiss X5 does not. Many photographers think it's a gimmick feature. Even so, some photographers don't mind having a better ISO sensitivity in boost mode, because it allows them to take photos that otherwise they would miss.In order to find out if the Nikon D5100 really does outperform the Canon T3i in terms of its high ISO performance, I went to dpreview.com to find out. In the Nikon D5100 preview page 8, you can see a high ISO comparison photograph that was taken with those two d-slr cameras (in JPEG)
My observations:
- ISO 800 - It looks like the Canon 600D (EOS Kiss X5 / EOS Rebel T3i) produces a sharper image with more details (viewing 100% crops). I terms of noise, I don't see any big differences between the two. Maybe the Canon EOS Rebel T3i has a very slight edge.
Better: Canon - ISO 1600 - Again, the Canon has a slight edge in terms of noise. However, the Canon EOS 600D performs much better in terms of details. The D5100 sample image on dpreview looks kind of soft. However, both produce much better photos compared to the Sony SLT-A55 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2.
Better: Canon - ISO 3200 - In ISO3200 I can observe vertical lines in the D5100 iamge. You can see that on the pinkish money bill at the center of the frame (also apparent in the D3100 photo). Those vertical lines aren't apparent in the 600D, Sony SLT-A55 or in the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2. In terms of noise, the Nikon D5100 has a slight edge. Both cameras perform much better than the Sony A55, Nikon D5100 and D3100.
The Nikon D5000 (previous model) image looks cleaner, but that's due to a high NR (noise reduction) algorithms in the camera.
Better: Nikon - ISO 6400 - Both cameras perform incredibly well in ISO 6400, still the D5100 has an edge, specially in the shadow/dark areas in the image. However, The 600D was able to pull out more details.
Better: Nikon - ISO 12800 - In this ISO setting, the Canon EOS 600D gains an edge over the D5100 in the darker areas, while the D5100 has a better IQ in the lighten areas. In contrast to my earlier observations, here the Nikon came out with better details.
Better: Nikon
Considering both the detail's resolvent power and noise, the Canon Rebel T3i has a better image quality up to ISO 1600, at ISO 3200 and above, Nikon wins in my opinion. It sits well with the fact that the D5100 has less pixel density due to the larger sensor and less pixels. I also wanted to add that the Nikon D5100 came up, surprisingly, with very good image quality at ISO12800. Remember, it's the same sensor that exists in the D7000. We all know that the D700 is a great high ISO performer. So the D5100 inherits that great sensor and we can see that it performs as good as the D7000.
Note: I still don't know what are those vertical lines that appear in the D5100 images. Maybe you can enlighten me about that phenomenon. I can't see it in the D7000, only in the D3100 and the D3100.
Battery Life
I didn't think that it would be such a big difference, but the Nikon D5100 battery life is 50% more than on the Rebel T3i (EOS 600D). That's 440 frames vs. 660 frames (CIPA). I knew that Nikon always produced great batteries for its SLR cameras, but I thought that the T3i will have better battery life than 440 frames. We can already see compact point-and-shoot cameras that have cross the 300 frames. I don't know how they both perform in practice, but according to the CIPA testing, the D5100 certainly have the edge here.sdfsdf
Which has a Better Video Quality?
I was managed to find some Nikon D5100 video samples on YouTube, but I was a bit suspicious about them, because it looks like someone just wanted to get more views and I can't really know for sure if those videos really came from the D5100. The only Nikon D5100 sample video that I saw on YouTube is the one that Nikon has made (a promotional video).The Canon 600D on the other hand, has many test videos on YouTube. For the sake of comparison equality, here is a 600D sample video from Canon.
When new D5100 test movies are uploaded to YouTube, I will update this section. I think that both Canon and Nikon are equally good when it comes to High Definition video recording. I am personally prefer the Canon video colors, although it can be adjusted with video editing software. Both cameras offer 1080p @ 30/25/24 frames per second. For comparison, the Nikon D3100 can only shot 24fps in 1080p.
Here is the video that according to the title, was shot with the D5100 dSLR with the stock lens (18-55mm VR lens). I don't know if it is authentic or not, but here it is..
Also worth mentioning that both cameras have support for an external stereo microphone. If you are about to shoot HD videos and want the best sound quality, an external stereo mic is the best option. When shooting videos you will found out that when shooting videos in AF-F, the camera's built-in mic capture the AF sound, quite noticeably. Using an external mic will solve that problem.
Continuous Shooting - 3.7fps vs 4fps
The Canon Rebel T3i has 3.7 frames per second continuous shooting, while the Nikon D5100 is a bit quicker with 4fps. I've read many comments from photographers complaining that that even though some Nikon cameras have faster burst, still, the buffer it smaller so they burst duration is lower than the Canon's. The Nikon D7000 has a 6fps continuous shooting. That's sound pretty good, but when looking at the "memory card capacity" page in the D7000 manual, you can see that you can capture "only" 31 frames (that's the buffer capacity) in JPEG fine 'Large' mode.That's means that you can only shoot 31 JPEG images in sequence if you decide to shoot sequence photographs in the JPEG highest resolution and image quality. The Canon 60D (5.3fps) for example performs much better and allows you to shoot more fast sequenced shots at 5.3fps.
That means that you shouldn't just be looking at the fps number, but look at the buffer capacity of the camera.
Canon EOS 600D Buffer capcity:
- JPEG (Large/Fine) 6.4MB - 34 frames
- JPEG (Large/Normal) 3.2MB - 1120 frames
- RAW 24.5MB - 6 frames
- RAW+JPEG (RAW/Lage) 30.9MB - 3 frames
Nikon D5100 Buffer capacity:
- JPEG (Large/Fine) 7.1MB - 100 frames
- JPEG (Large/Normal) 3.9MB - 100 frames
- RAW 16.4MV - 16 frames
- RAW+JPEG (RAW/Large) 23.9MB - 10 frames
* a partial list (from the camera's manual)
I'll still want to see how it operates in practice. Even so, considering the buffer capacities that is shown in the manual, you can see that we have a mixed bag here. In JPEG(Large/Fine) mode you can shoot three times more sequence photos on the D5100 compared to the Canon 600D. On the other hand, in JPEG (Large/Normal) you can shoot approx. 11 times more on the 600D compared to the D5100.
Well, that's the dry numbers and I still wait to see how they both compare in field test reviews. If you have more insight about these specs, please feel free to comment and share your opinion.
Articulated 3-inch LCD
Both the Nikon D5100 and the Canon Rebel T3i (EOS 600D) have a 3-inch articulated LCD screen. The Canon has a slightly better resolution of 1040K-dot vs 921K-dot of the D5100. I personally viewed cameras with both LCD resolutions and didn't find any big visual differences between the two. I wouldn't based any part of my buying decision based on that resolution difference. I can just assume that both LCD monitors produce sharp and high quality image and enhance the user experience and usability compared to LCD monitors with lower resolutions.It's great to see that Nikon has continued its tradition and put an articulated LCD on the D5100, as it did on the D5000. It is very useful when shooting videos. Of course it is useful for still to. When I had my Canon 60D, I found the articulated (swivel/tilt) screen very useful for my type of photography shooting habits. I love to shoot pictures in various weird angles, so the articulated LCD was perfect for my needs. Unfortunately I had problems with the camera and decided to return it. A month later I bought the Nikon D3100, but it has a fixed LCD. I actually miss the articulated screen that I had on the 60D, especially when shooting movie clips.
Price
Nikon D5100 Estimated Price:body only - $800 / €777 / £670
with 18-55mm VR Kit lens - $900 / €904 / £780
Canon Rebel T3i (600D/Kiss X5) Estimated Price (via Amazon):
body only - $830
with 18-55mm IS kit lens - $1000
Nikon has set the initial release price at $800 for the body itself. It is a very competitive price that should hopefully attract new customers to buy the D5100 instead of the T3i/600D.
Conclusion
The Nikon D5100 is a very interesting camera. It feature all the great features that more advanced photographers have wished for. The price is just right and the camera looks very promising indeed. As you can see from this D5100 vs T3i/600D comparison review, both cameras have their pros and cons. In terms of image quality, I think that the Canon 600D has the edge. In terms of high ISO performance, the D5100 has produced cleaner images from ISO 3200 and above (my observation).Both cameras have a 3-inch high-res swivel/tilt LCD screen. Both cameras can record 1080p Full HD videos in various popular frame rates. The D5100 is a bit smaller in size and lighter, but nothing that will convince you from purchasing one over another. The 1.8-million pixel advantage of the 600D is not a reason why you should prefer the 600D over the D5100. For me, it's hard to decide which one is better. I think they both are excellent cameras and have their pros and cons (mostly pros).
Please share you own opinion by commenting below. Tell us which one is better in your opinion and why. Thanks.
I personally went with the Canon T3i over the D5100 because I think it is a superior camera for professional use. First and foremost, the buttons. Sounds silly, but the Nikon is lacking some important buttons that the Canon puts in plain sight. The most important I think is the direct ISO-button. The canon also has a dedicated white balance button, drive mode button, and AF mode button. They seem to be laid out a little better as well which would make shooting a little quicker and hassle free. Secondly, the viewfinder magnification at 0.85% is much welcomed over the Nikon's. The quality of the Canon's camera build can really be felt over the D5100. When holding the D5100, it feels cheap... like a little too entry level. The T3i fits better in your hands and has a sturdier feel to it. Finally, the user interface. The menus on the Canon are a lot more thought out and better designed over the Nikon's making it easier to use and discover. Overall, I think with better image quality and quick access to settings via buttons is a huge advantage and all these reasons are why I chose the T3i. I'd like to note that I am not partial to Canon and in fact the T3i was my first Canon. Before I had a Nikon D80 and this Canon was the replacement. In my profession (automotive photography), I shoot a lot of awkward angles and although the T3i is not anything like any EOS 1D, that live-view variable angle screen is VERY useful!
ReplyDeleteI have owned both cameras and prefer the Nikon over the Canon for one main reason - it works. I had lot's of problems with the Canon models T2i and T3i stopping during recording without warning, well before the 12 minute limit was reached. It happened enough times on four different Canon cameras to make me feel the Canons were not capable of buffering the video fast enough to write to the SD card. The same Transcend SD class 10 cards that stalled in the Canon have worked without a hitch in the Nikon for six months.
DeleteThat being said, I prefer the Canon for sound quality, as the Nikon has a noisy mike preamp, even with a decent external mike.
For recording at lower video rates, the Nikon wins, because at 720p mode, the file size is less than half the size of 1080 mode. On the Canon, even at lower resolution, the file size stays the same.
The Nikon seems to perform about one F-stop better than the Canon. The image quality is very similar between the two cameras, with the Nikon edging more toward realistic and the Canon a little overly saturated.
Sounds as if these two cameras are almost one and the same. I'd think if a pro were to buy one, it would come down to continuity with which ever system (investment in lenses), he or she is already into.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great review, it's definitely one of the more insightful comparison articles I've read thus far. I'm actually in the market for my first DSLR and it has come down to these two cameras, but I can't decide which to purchase. Both seem like great cameras that should prove a good investment while providing me the chance to grow into them as I learn more and my interest in this hobby grows.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I'm still having trouble deciding because I've heard so many different things regarding Canon vs. Nikon. Part of me is definitely leaning towards the Canon as I've had a point-and-shoot (SD750) for a few years now and have been very happy with the image quality and feel very comfortable with the menus, which I'm sure are probably more involved/advanced in the DSLRs, but still, I feel like I should stay within the family. However, I also want to make sure I'm getting something that will result in the best picture quality, which I know is often subjective and based on so many different variables.
Ultimately, I plan on using this camera primarily for outdoor shots. I see myself using this camera a lot for landscape/nature shots (day & night) as well as those occasions where I want the best possible photo and my point-and-shoot will not suffice. I'm sure there will be plenty of other uses I find for it including portraits, some sports/pets, and more, and I'll probably use the video recording features a little bit as well.
Any insight that anyone could provide would be greatly appreciative, especially if there is anything that I should be aware of or looking for as a first time DSLR owner.
Thanks,
Ben
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI'd like to know about lenses compatibility (manual and autofocus lenses)
Thnx
what were your problems with Canon 60D? I'm curious.
ReplyDeleteI have only read reviews on the internet about both the cameras and feel that both the cameras are competing neck to neck. I had almost finalised Canon 600D when the rumours of Nikon D5100 erupted and I waited for the Nikon D5100 to release. Nikon D5100 is about 20% cheaper than the Canon eos600D in India. For such great value for money and about the same features, I would jump for the Nikon 5100D. In fact the Nikon has two features which attract me - continuous AF in video and the special effects in video mode. Also its high ISO and night vision mode should also be an added bonus.
ReplyDeleteI had almost finalised the 600D but now I'm going to buy the D5100 for its price and more features.
I researched both Nikon D5100 and Canon 600D. Finally bought Nikon because:
Delete1) Nikon is 20% cheaper than Canon
2) Nikon used D7000 sensor from Sony, the best
3) Nikon lenses are cheaper
Finally I bought it from a Nikon DSLR Zone though on-line shopping like Homeshop18.com was cheaper.
Used Nikon D5100 with 18-55 Kit, 55-200 Zoom & 50 Prime with great results.
You didn't mention that Nikon's lower level DSLRs (and the D5100 is no exception) do not have a focus motor in the body, so some of the older Nikon lens designs (but lenses still being manufactured and sold) will not auto-focus on these bodies. BTW, your review reads as if you wanted to favor the Nikon. (e.g. "Nikon has set the initial release price at $800 ... that should hopefully attract new customers to buy the D5100 instead of the T3i/600D.") Sure sounds like you have a bias.
ReplyDeletecanon does not have focus motor in the body either. if it does then why two types of lens ultrasonic and normal EF?
DeleteI want a good camera to take pictures of my kids, especially from far away on the sports field, and scenes when traveling.I want to be able to enlarge to poster size possibly. I am between the D90, (awaiting news on the replacement) the Canon T3i or now the Nikon D5100. Video, don't know how much that matters to me. Which of these is best for me or is there another in these families? This will be my first DSLR. Any suggestions or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI went through this post and decided and purchased the T3i. The T3i makes great pictures for me, but I'm new to DSLRs. So what can I say to help? Well I offer this, I have played with the video capture. You can manually focus while filming. So that takes a little of the negative of not having AF during a video. Ultimately, what helped me make my decision was the comparisons I have read on the ISO Levels. If you see yourself taking more pictures in dark areas and trying to make videos that are works of art then go with the Nikon. If most of your pictures will probably be in a lighted area and you will take seldom videos that don't need to be movie quality as you manually focus, get the Canon. I don't see myself taking a lot of dark pictures, so I picked the T3i. The video, I just don't see myself generating 100's of home movies, or filming Jurassic Park 5.
ReplyDeleteThere is a very marginal difference between the two. At similar prices, it would boil down to individual choices, the difference is so marginal.
ReplyDeleteIn India, Nikon is pricing at import parity prices while Canon is charging a 20% premium, something they would have to reduce if they want to compete now.
the choice is clear when you are choosing a body is that what lenses you have already. once you invested in good lenses you do not want to change the brand because in every brand there are good and bad camera bodys but it is very hard to change your whole lens setup.
Deleteboth are almost same.
ReplyDeleteI opt for nikon d5100, & also buy additional lenses. :)
The 600d battery life is actually 550, however it could actually takes more than 700 and its still running with two bars battery from what I have experienced form mine =)
ReplyDelete>IIIMPower
ReplyDeletethe most helpful comment so far if you are thinking over these two models. and yet another choice: go 550D and save some money for better lens.
Tried both. Found the D5100 superior. Cost and image quality. You have to test it yourself, not rely on dp review for such a comparison. Also, I honestly thought that the d5100 had better image quality. If I play the same game as you, then I might as well mention that the D5100 is ranked 12 on DxO mark camera rankings. Pretty good sensor performance. I don't see the 600d anywhere close to it. Lastly, I honestly think that both cameras perform well in good light, but the d5100 takes the advantage in low light.
ReplyDeleteBoth these cameras are good and well matched, but according to me Canon is a little better as compared to Nikon. The built quality of 600D(T3i) is a little better compared to that of D5100. Also Canon features a better interface and quick access to menu settings via dedicated shortcut buttons, which is more appealing to me.
ReplyDeleteOne of the best part about canon is that any of the canon lens can be attached on the 600D(T3i) body, whereas nikon restricts to only DX format lenses. Therefore canon provides more flexibility and better choices of lenses.
And 600D looks better;)
Therefore i bought a brand new Canon EOS 600D even though the Nikon D5100 is cheaper by almost 20% here in India.
Understand the Nikon is assembled in China while Canon is still made in Japan. Can anyone advice if this is true?
Deletemy nikon d3100 is from Thailand
DeleteMy Canon EOS 600D is Made in Taiwan. I bought it in Saudi Arabia.
DeleteHow much it cost in saudi? In Indian rupees
Deletetake a look at their head to head comparison ---> http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-600d-vs-Nikon-D5100 :)
ReplyDeleteHi pplz, first of all many thanks to a great review / comparison!! most helpful to me so far and i`ve read a lot of articles :)
ReplyDeleteim also in doubt for my first DSLR between the NIKON D90, D5100 and the Canon 600D. IMHO the specifications are very much the same and i think personal preferance will have to make the final choise. Im just not sure how important the lack of AF in the body of the d5100 is and the lack of AF in video on the 600d, as for the D90 its almost 3 years old and doesnt have the swirl screen.
at the moment im leaning towards the Canon 600D cause of the AF motor in the body wich should give more options on lenses, and video is less important for me.
Can anyone advise me on how hard it actually is to make a video with the Canon 600D please?
or any other good argument why the D90 is stil a good choise?
thanks, regards
Mark
Keep on shooting :)
My feeling is that sample pictures at dpreview or other sites (e.g. www.dkamera.de/testbericht/bildqualitaet.html) show a different picture in favour of 600D. And as an relatively inexperienced photographer I don't see too many occasions to use >ISO 3200.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, I don't know whether unprocessed RAW picture comparison (DXOMark and snapsort relies heavily on that) are really relevant for most photographers. Because all Canon is scoring very low in DXOMark but approx. 50% of professional photographers still prefer that brand.
Anyway, both are definitely very close and in the end hardly any buyer will have to compare them later side by side. So you can't be really wrong.
@ Mark:
reliable digitalrev at youtube suggested 600D over D5100 when specially interested in video capabilities.
But I think you are not right with regard to an AF motor in the 600D body. Similar to D5100 it's only in the lens.
I think for a new DSLR owner the difficulty in interface buttons/layout are going to be same for any of the two brands. It will be a learning experience either way.
ReplyDelete(I am a bit biased on Nikon)
Question for first time DSLR users:
About no AF in Nikon, will you be buying old lenses(non AF-S) this soon and on this body (D5100)?
What about the kit lens comparison for both, the 18-55's are both (Canon and Nikon) same in quality and performance?
I have read Nikon lens is better!
There are almost no major differences between these two cameras. It will not make you a better photographer by choosing one over the other. It comes down to the size of your hands. If you have larger hands, you go for Canon 600D. People with smaller hands would be happy with Nikon D5100.
ReplyDeleteI have the Nikon D5000, and when the Nikon D5100 was released, I thought that I should trade it in for the D5100. But I stopped short of doing so when I reflected on the problems I had with the D5000. The D5000, like the D5100, is mainly menu driven, and this can be very frustrating at times. Also, there is no in-built motor in the D5000 ( similar to D5100 ). This means we cannot use older Nikon AF lenses with the D5100.
ReplyDeleteI also have a Canon 400D, which is a real pleasure to use. All the important functions have dedicated buttons at the back.
I went to my favorite camera store and handled both the D5100 and the D600, and I felt much happier with the Canon. It fit snugly into my hands, and the buttons are all in the right place. The fact that the Nikon can take better pictures in low light is no deal breaker for me. I think I'll purchase the D600, since I have an equal number of Canon and Nikon lenses.
There is no doubt that both are good cameras. One advantage the Nikon D5100 has is that the standard 18-55mm kit lens is better than the Canon. See the comparison samples from http://www.digitalreview.ca at:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Canon-Rebel-T3i-EOS-600D-Compared-to-Nikon-D5100.shtml
With the T3i you are better off upgrading the lens to the 18-135mm IS kit lens or invest in another higher end Canon lens.
Canon is edge over......its IS is better than nikon's VR. ISO is not a basic need for choosing 5100D. 600D has got inbuilt filters which D5100 lacks .
ReplyDeleteWhen 600D was released i told myself this should be my first DSLR. The 3-10x digital zoom on video has many uses. But then i heard the rumors about D5100 and having continuos AF on video. Not even the high end Canon DSLR's have this and is quite essential for me to capture Surfing videos. and the built-in HDR mode is sweet. So if 600D's only edge is the SUPERIOR Video zoom, then i can sacrifice it for d5100's larger sensor, more color, continous AF in Video(manual focusing on video sucks) thats why Video cams have Auto focus on video right? what's a video with no auto focus! :) But i still need help in choosing between the two, i need to be convinced more over the 600D. So help me guys who have tried and tested both. :)
ReplyDeleteI used them both and I prefer the D5100 and bought it when it was announced. It's a great video camera. Put it a Zeiss compact and you can produce a Movie good for a theater. Controls are a preference. I find the Nikons are quicker than a Canon. You don't have to dig in the Menu if you know how to use the buttons.
ReplyDeleteSambo
Do both cameras feature video zoom? That is important to me.
ReplyDeleteArlene: The lens you attach to the camera defines the optical zoom range, so if you have zoom objective - you have zoom.
ReplyDeleteAnd I don't really understand the fuzz about D5100 not having internal focus motor. Sure, it is a big thing if you have some old expensive optics from the 35mm film cameras with the screw-drive, but in that case you have already chosen your brand and just need to choose your camera model accordingly. I haven't seen those old objectives in shops anymore, and I really don't see why someone would even want to go and buy such thing anymore when there are more recent, better objectives to do the same for all the same focal ranges.
haha, canon is oversharping by inhouse jpeg conversion, everyone knows, here is the true:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Camera-Sensor/Compare/Compare-sensors/(appareil1)/692%7C0/(appareil2)/698%7C0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Canon/(brand2)/Nikon
Great article. Helps me make a decision. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteNo mention of off camera feature?
ReplyDeleteTried both(t3i and d5100) side by side and then went for Nikon D 5100 !
ReplyDeleteTried the T3i and D5100 together and I went with the D5100. The pictures on the T3i were slightly washed out. The colours on the D5100 were crisp, bold, and dynamic. They are on par with the D7000!!! (Nikon's higher-end DSLR). Their video feature is also one of the best. The buttons will take some getting used to. This is my first DSLR so it doesn't really make a HUGE difference as I am not used to something else already. I don't forsee buying professional lenses or old-school lenses anytime soon. If I am going to get THAT serious about my photography, then I will definitely be upgrading the body for a MUCH BIGGER sensor. D5100 also has faster shutter-speed than the T3i. Body-wise they both look very similar in person. They are sturdy. Flash also on the D5100 is quite high and 'out of your face' which prevents red-eye. RAW images are far, FAR better on the D5100 as well. (Isn't that why we are buying the camera? I mean, for the pictures!?)
ReplyDeleteI too have been trying to decide between these two models. I'm not into video, so Canon's edge there is not an advantage for me. I like to shoot landscapes in low light, so I'm leaning toward the D5100. The ease of use in layout of buttons and menus is a concern, but I use a Nikon p500 and find it easy to use. I don't know if the advance to DSLR makes a big difference between a point and shoot and a DSLR, but as a first-tIme DSLR user, I will have to learn a lot to use it anyway. Another plus as far as the Nikon is concerned is the faster fps. I don't have any lenses already, but Canon seems to have more lenses to choose from, so that would be a plus for Canon. On the other hand, I probably won't be buying more than a few lenses, so that may not not be too important in the long run. Until I get my hands on them to compare handling, I'm leaning toward the D5100.
ReplyDeletei recently bought a d5100 and was quite impressed.
ReplyDeleteYour review gives an excellent account of both cameras. Thank you. But are you a wee bit inclined towards Nikon? You seem to be a Nikon pal. So am I; but when we are comparing two cameras we have to leave that aside. What about the much better resolution of 18 MP of Canon against Nikon's 16 MP? That is a big issues, dont you think?
ReplyDeleteThe video features of the Canon are a bit better. For example, it offers face detection and 10x magnification during live view mode. On the other hand, the kit lens that comes with the Nikon is a bit better. It uses a quiet motor, and has less color distortion around the edges. If you are a big fan of speedlights, you should remember that the Canon offers built in speedlight control and the Nikon does not.
ReplyDeleteI like the color and the focus of the Nikon a little better, and the "real world" resolution of the Nikon seems higher to me. But some people prefer the Canon for the same reasons.
hi,
ReplyDeletethanx for the adds
i would like to go for a nikon d 5100 . which would be the perfect additional lenses for me. i like wild life photography, nature , and flowers also.. waiting for your reply.. many thanx..
If you want colors in a photo, go for the Canon. But when you want Depths in a photo, Nikon is far better.
ReplyDeleteI used both. And my opinion is, 1st you think what you want. Then go for that.
I go for the Nikon D5100.
All the spec comparison is a wash. Those differences are so small that they should not be deciding factor.
ReplyDeleteOn the jpg comparison for ISO800-1600, Canon applies more sharpening to the images than Nikon. This doesn't mean Canon produce better image at lower ISO. D5100 having slightly lower noise at higher ISO is true and measurable.
It is all about personal preference. Hold the DSLR in person and try out the features, menu system, buttons. I think then you will find which system is right for you.
Guys,
ReplyDeleteI am also confused between Nikon D5100 and Canon 600D, I am new to the DSLR world with a limited budget of $800. Image quality and better navigation is a priority for me.
I want to but Canon 600d but still confused, what will I do, I want better all over.
ReplyDeleteOne simple thing though. Just turn both cameras upside down and see at the bottom label there: Nikon D5100 is "Made in Thailand" while Canon 600D is "Made in Japan". Will these make a difference?
ReplyDeleteFor sure the t3i has an edge over the nikon d5100 as i have both of them
ReplyDeleteI am new in DSLR photography but I decided to buy Nikon d5100 for its low price and almost the same features as of canon 600d. Excellent iso sensitivity with d5100 at a reasonable price, go for it guys.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting comments here. I've been using film based Minolta alpha 7700i. Now shopping for a smaller DSLR. Price is a factor for me at the moment. Also, size & weight. So, the two are my preferred options.
ReplyDeleteIn a way, it seems to be hard for reviewers to eliminate one's bias when doing testings.
Initially I leaned towards the Canon (in Japan it's Kiss Eos x5). But it seems like (I've also heard the same) Canon brightens pictures to some extend, while Nikon has more natural colors. How much true it is I do not know but has seen some bench-marked photos. I'm preferring true natural colors. Is one then correct to pick the Nikon for this?
One thing I've liked (about the D5100) while trying both at the shops) is the shutter noise. The Nikon to me is much quieter. When you click on the shutter, the Canon is louder.
But as some have said, it's very hard to pinpoint the better one, the final decision should here be on one's taste preferences.
As for the built-in motors, I think both models don't have them. They both have lens-based motors. I think one can also use older lenses (for both makes) but on manual focus only.
As for where they're built, I think that should not influence you. I'm based in Japan and I think that's no longer an issue even here in Japan. Most major electronics are nowadays made outside Japan, the US or the EU.
I have a canon EOS 600D. I bought it because of the much higher pixel it has and most especially the built-in wireless flash trigger transmitter.
ReplyDeleteIf you are looking for a good DSLR camera and you do not want to use additional software to correct artifacts on your JPEG, you should definitely choose Nikon D5100:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Nikon_D5100/outdoor_results.shtml
Canon often suffers from its lack of in-camera chromatic aberration reduction. The final row of crops in particular show a preferable result for the Nikon, but if fringing had been eliminated on the Canon (such as via a RAW file), the advantage would actually side with the Canon. As such, if you're shooting high contrast scenes with in-camera JPEGs, the D5100 would arguably enjoy an edge over the 600D / T3i.
If you are planning to use your camera mostly for movies go for Canon 600D.
And yes build quality of Canon is better.
After reading all the comments I'm thinking of going for the Nikon D5100. This will be my 1st DSLR camera, looks like the Nikon is better quality for taking photo's. I only want photos for family times ahead, vacations / trip to the zoo with the kids etc. I do like Canons menu which is more user friendly but the image quality is better on nikon. Also 1 year warranty with canon and 2 year warranty with nikon, Nikon 20% cheaper, better image quality.
ReplyDeleteAm I making the right choice ?
^ I am currently shopping for my first DSLR and looking between these two fine cameras as well. With the exception of some miniscule specs, all signs point to the Nikon. The Canon seems to have a better battery life and viewfinder but the final image seems to go to the Nikon despite its lower MP (16.1 vs Canon's 17.9.
ReplyDeleteWhile either would be a great investment, as you noted, the Nikon delivers with overall better images (which is the main purpose of a camera after all, isn't it?), a longer warrenty, and a significantly cheaper price. Plus if you purchase it in a Kit, you will save even more with the lens. I visited B&H yesterday and they are offering deals with the Nikon that will save you $100 on an 55-200 lens and $150 on an 55-300 lens, which seems to be about 40%
As of the moment I am leaning heavily towards the Nikon 5100 unless someone can disuade me.
I only wonder if anyone is aware of a more all-inclusive lens. Something along the lines of 18-200. This way I won't need two lenses (18-55 and 55-200)
There is very little difference between the two? I believe personal preference in the brand is the real reason for choosing one over the other, then justifying a choice with one or two attributes as I am about to do. I decided on the D5100 and my justification for my choice is the size of the sensor (size does matter after all, not so?). Comments with regard to the limitations on Nikon's lenses is a bit of a farse - relative to the price of the body, lenses are extremely expensive and unlikely that you will "run" out of options when bying a Nikon lens, whatever your choice - you will of course have to be a millionare to aquire all of the DX format lenses. I am not that interested in video but from what I read the lack in AF in Canon is a big win for Nikon. I must at least give something back to Canon, the look and feel is theirs but on this point others may differ.
ReplyDeleteWhich is more expensive or much higher price(in peso), D5100 or 600D ?
ReplyDeleteAs for me, i go for Canon 600D due to several reasons: firstly, Canon has master/remote flash capability (very useful for macro photography using metz wireless ring flash); secondly, i can use the Canon MP-E65 1- 5x magnification macro lens; third, it has 18MP sensor which is ideal for cropping in macro photography.....
ReplyDeleteI first decided on the Nikon for several reasons- the reviews about image quality, slightly lighter and cheaper, my relatives have Nikon DSLR, and I had a good experience with my old coolpix's buttons and menus. BUT then after a week of using it, the LCD blacks out when turned 180 deg. What I read online about Nikon repair/ customer service is very discouraging even under warranty period. This is the 2nd time we had a faulty new nikon ( this one and Nikon P7000). I really wanted a reliable product.
ReplyDeleteSo I switched over to Canon t3i with reservation because I already spent time learning Nikon's controls (usually shooting auto or P mode). This is my very first time using DSLR.
Well,to my surprised, I couldn't be happier. This T3i is so intuitive, I think I will actually shoot more on the creative mode. It makes learning the buttons, menus, how and why to use Aperture priority, Shutter speed priority, manual settings fun. It is not as cumbersome and difficult to remember changing the settings. I could change the setting without taking my eyes off my subject. I am now realizing the creative potential of a Dslr. If a camera is just a tool, then it needs to be intuitive enough to be use creatively, so more time is spent thinking of the composition.
Anyway, I did not understand this when I was using the Nikon, I thought it would be too cumbersome to change the settings, since they are mostly buried under menus.
I'm thinking of going for the Nikon D5100 body only and purchasing a high spec lens.
ReplyDelete50mm f/1.4D AF NIKKOR
http://www.europe-nikon.com/en_GB/product/nikkor-lenses/auto-focus-lenses/fx/single-focal-length/50mm-f-1-4d-af-nikkor
Am I making the right choice?
Only want the camera for holidays / family times etc.
Unless one of these features jumps out and sways you one way or another. Or you already have lens to use on one of these fine cameras. The real solution to those still deciding is to go to a camera shop and put each one in your hands. See how they each fit in your hands. To decide any other way is foolish.
ReplyDeleteam a beginner in the world of DSLR equip, for me all cameras have same function but different features, the important for me is to comply the needs of the user in easy way, and to enjoy every captured shoot of the camera's...
ReplyDeletei had been debating as what to buy, a NIKON D5100 or a CANON Rebel T3i. i compared the specifications of both cameras and i had noted that each has its advantages over the other. i spent several hours reading reviews and comments, as well as watching countless comparative videos and i ended up buying a NIKON D5100.
ReplyDeletei am certain i will enjoy shooting landscapes, the sunset and sunrise at low lights with my NIKON D5100.
OMG i am so confused and i have looked up all comparisons for the canon t3i vs the Nikon D90 i am leaning towards the nikon D90 ( 5100 ) i believe it is also called. This is my first DSLR as well and can't see myself taking much video and have heard the D90 is better quality pictures and also heard if you want to grow with your camera go for the Nikon D90 ?? Cost here in Canada are almost the same for both cameras. I believe even though the Nikon is a bit heavier it feels more solid then the canon. I like were the buttons are placed on the Nikon as well and it seems to me the pics are crisper on the Nikon. Am i making the right decision ? Hope so as its only my hard earned money i am spending here :( Thanks for any help you can give me
ReplyDeleteIt’s also worth mentioning that the T3i (600d) also does 720p60 in movie mode, and the D5100 does not. This is important if you are looking at doing nice slow-motion. The 60fps looks great compared to the 30fps.
ReplyDeleteGoing back and forth between D5100 and T3i - need a camera that will be good for shooting my kids soccer and basketball games. HELP!!!
ReplyDeleteNikon tops them all. Wonder why more professional photographers prefer Nikon?
ReplyDeleteFor me the best advantage with Canon bodies is that you can buy lenses a little bit cheaper than Nikon's ones(in general) and also they have a very good video quality comparing them with the Nikon's(if we don't take in consideration the effects and the AF), But I think that Nikon is way better in terms of Image quality and details specially in low light conditions..
ReplyDeleteSo my advise is that if you're seeking for a camera to use it for taking pictures AND to record videos of high quality at same time, then just go for the 600D, but if your major reason from buying a dslr is to take pictures (specially landscapes), so Nikon is better for you...
So if you decided finally to go for one model rather than the other, just remember that both are excellent cameras and the difference is really not that big, so just enjoy it!
P.S: I personally went for the d5100 and I have tested the 600D(of a friend) many times, there's not really a huge diff..
The image quality of the Canon 600D is definitely superior upto ISO 1600. At ISO 3200 i'd say that both the Nikon D5100 & Canon 600D are literally neck and neck. I cannot see any significant differences in IQ at this point... if anything the canon seems to retain better detail in certain finer aspects of a photo. At the same time the nikon's image seems to be ever so slightly grainier, whilst giving the impression of better detail retention. To be honest i've taken a ton of shots with both camera's at high ISO's and there are numerous pictures in each case the i prefer. So to categorically say one camera has better high ISO performance over the other would be baseless speculation. The only setting at with the Nikon D5100 is clearly better is 12800.
ReplyDeleteI am planning to buy one of those competitors near christmas. After tons of head to head comparisons all over the web and youtube videos, i've managed to get some good and strong conclusions:
ReplyDeleteCanon is better in your hands.
Nikon's sensor is more advanced than Canon's.
Battery (strong issue) is far better in Nikon.
Video, let's face it. Sure autofocus is good, but the Canon performs better and has better quality.
Image quality - The real comparison:
Canon has better image quality than Nikon up to iso 1600. And better colours. Nikon seems to present more 'warm' colours than Canon does.
Nikon is better from 3200 and above.
Personally, i am a Nikon fan, but to be honest after all these reviews both perform in general terms very good.
I went ahead and bought the Nikon D5100 for the following reasons:
ReplyDelete1- Nikon will give better image quality no matter what because of its advanced sensor technology. At higher ISOs, Nikon D5100 is a winner any day.
2- Canon beats Nikon hands down as far as video is concerned. But given the fact that I am not really into making movies or shooting a lot of videos, it doesn't bother me.
3- The effects feature (B&W, miniature etc.) in D5100 appeals to me.
4- I am price sensitive. With so many reviews saying it is difficult to choose which is better of the two, I opted for Nikon and am extremely happy with my buy.
A word of caution: The Nikon worldwide helpline numbers are useless really. Their technical support (at least when I called) was absolutely useless. ( Actually the guy on the line could not connect me to a DSLR techie for some reason which really ticked me off.)
I've been going through the same ordeal in comparing the 2, and here's my conclusion: Nikon D5100 is the clear winner. Here's why:
ReplyDelete1) I need to be able to shoot video for do-it-yourself music videos, and the lack of the AF in the Canon was a total nuisance. Even simple videos of my baby daughter was a pain with the Canon. Both hands are occupied, one holding the camera, the other fiddling with the focus. That's inconvenient when you want a hand free to hold an external mic. Also, I found that with the Canon, your eyes must be glued to the viewfinder to ensure the image stays in focus. The AF in the Nikon will be very valuable since it eliminates all these aforementioned problems.
2) Nikon has thought ahead and produced a stereo mic (ME-1) that can be easily mounted on the camera. If you check for mics for the Canon, you'll see many have reported problems with noise quality. And there are lingering questions about which mic to use. This problem doesn't exist with the Nikon. And don't think that you don't need an external mic, especially with the Canon. The video picks up loud motor noise in the Canon.
3) Battery life is very important, especially if you're trekking in the mountains like I do, and you have no power source available. Nikon wins here.
4) Low light conditions in bars, warehouses, and other places where bands and skateboarders hang out will make Nikon a winner.
5) Faster continous shooting, 4 vs. 3.7, makes Nikon a winner.
Hi, of all the review notes I've been reading in various sites so far, you came up as the first commenter that has the same usage needs as I. Your arguents REALLY have convinced me that Nikon is indeed the Winner ;)
DeleteThanks.
Mário
The NIKON 5100 video autofocus looks totally useless as it keeps on finding focus and makes lot of noise. The autofocus is very slow. For autofocus in video only sony has got it right.
DeleteBoth are amazing devices with a lot to offer but I chose Canon for the following reasons:
ReplyDelete1. More compact, I have a better grip on it.
2. Better battery
3. Wireless flash controller
Here's another great comparison, check it out - compares them side-by-side:
http://getcomparisons.com/canon-eos-600d-vs-nikon-d5100
so which is better for me plz tell i can,t decide . but i am going to buy one of them .
ReplyDeleteToo small difference between the quality of the images of 600D vs. D5100 to say that one is better than another. Choose the one you prefere. And don't listen to the fanboys.
ReplyDeleteBoth are so equal in almost all aspect, please do not carried away by people who are fan of particular brand. Your choice matters, whichever you buy, you are going to get superb image quality.
ReplyDeleteHi friends! I have been using both camera quite a while. My suggestions to you is, if you have decided to buy a camera from among these two then please go to the show room, and experience yourself. Whichever you feel better, just pick up that. Indeed, both are equality good, no doubt about that!
ReplyDeleteAfter endless debate of which is better I purchased the Nikon D5100, and I am extremely happy. The camera works like a dream. I found a deal at one of the discount club stores which included a camera bag, the camera, the 18-55 VR zoom and a 55-200 VR zoom lens, instructional video. I also purchased an extended 2 year warranty(which I highly recommend), a 16 megabyte HC memory card. The grand total was 1,049.00 I was able to stay close to my 1000 dollar cap and have 2 very good lens . In my opinion the extra lens is key to enjoying either of these cameras. I wanted my DSLR for the photo capabilities. I already have a good Sony video camera and I could care less about a wireless remote flash controller. Don't even know why I would need one. Happy photo shopping to all
ReplyDeleteI also think that high ISO for the 5100 is just a gimmick.
ReplyDeleteLarge sensor size and lower resolution only matters if you compare the same lens.
I have always used nikon cameras. Just bought a 600D for a friend and used it for a while....
ReplyDeleteI think if I had to buy a new camera...probably I would get a nikon to canon lens adapter so I can still use my bellows and shift lens and change to Canon for good.
I purchased Canon 600D,The one they put in the store display was made in Japan but the one they give me is made in Taiwan so please make sure before u pay ur money it`s made in japan or Taiwan.
ReplyDeleteHere another advantage Canon over Nikon if you have already a system.
ReplyDeleteFor Canon EOS600D you dont have to waste extra money for the lens if you already have lenses. The Canon camera can be bought body only.
The Nikon D5100 only comes as Kit. So, you end up with just another useless lens lying around. They told me in the shop that only the expensive Nikon cameras can be bought body only. How silly is that?
I also agree with IIIMPower ...When holding the D5100 it feels cheap and that is because the grip where you hold the camera is smaller.
Some Minus points the Nikon has I found out today:
ReplyDeleteCanon has a mirror lock up for less vibration during shooting and Nikon doesnt
Canon, when in Live view mode takes pictures faster than Nikon. With Nikon you have all those things going on with the slow mirror before the pic can be taken. When I was in the store I tried the Canon and Nikon. It was also quite easy to use Cnaion with self timer 2s. When pressing the self timer button on the Nikon it gave us only 2s with remote or 10s. It makes very little sense to use 2s self timer with remote.
The Nikon, when it comes to some options is rather ill conceived.
Also that graphical shutter speed and aperture display the Nikon has is something utterly useless. I see the aperture and shutter speed as numbers. The graphical representation doesnt help at all and wastes display area which could be used for something more important.
The D5100 has a modus, were the mirror is going up and shutter goes only a second later, eliminating mirror vibration. The graphical display can be changed to an older style with numbers. The D5100 is presumably superior because of "Auto Active D-Lighting" and is a great flash performer together with Nikon flashes. With a good lens (Nikon 2.8 40 mm Micro instead of 1.8 35 mm or the kit lens 18-55) the camera makes outstanding pictures. And with the kit lens, Nikon has distortion compensation, the Canon has not. I really don`t know, for what one should need more knobs. Put the D5100 on Auto-ISO up to 6400 and change programs with the dedicated knob between M, A, S, P and do exposure compensation with another dedicated knob. I`m a JPG-shooter, that alone excludes Canon.
DeleteCanon 600D/T3i/Kiss X5 is more than better comparing nikon D5100..b'coz...
ReplyDeleteLCD 3-inch
1,040,000 dot
Articulated 3-inch
921,000 dot
Articulated
Viewfinder Pentamirror
Coverage: 95%
Magnification: 0.85%
ISO 800 - It looks like the Canon 600D (EOS Kiss X5 / EOS Rebel T3i) produces a sharper image with more details (viewing 100% crops). I terms of noise, I don't see any big differences between the two. Maybe the Canon EOS Rebel T3i has a very slight edge.
ISO 1600 - Again, the Canon has a slight edge in terms of noise. However, the Canon EOS 600D performs much better in terms of details. The D5100 sample image on dpreview looks kind of soft. However, both produce much better photos compared to the Sony SLT-A55 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2.
Canon EOS 600D Buffer capcity:
JPEG (Large/Fine) 6.4MB - 34 frames
JPEG (Large/Normal) 3.2MB - 1120 frames
RAW 24.5MB - 6 frames
RAW+JPEG (RAW/Lage) 30.9MB - 3 frames
buy the cannon on qvc, try it out, can return by 1/31/12 for full refund if you don't like it.
ReplyDelete600D is the only DSLR that allows you to control the input volume. If you are going to make videos that have recorded sound, via a external mike, then you NEED to be able to control the input sound, otherwise, it might clip.
ReplyDeleteHence for video use ... currently the Canon 600D is the only camera that has this kind of function. No other DSLR has this.
If sound is not an issue, then the Nikon or newest Sony are better as they have autofocus for video, which can save a lot of time during filming on the fly. I've seen that the Sony is even better than Nikon. But again, neither of these have input volume control for audio.
After reading all these posts, I'm still confused as to which one to buy this coming week. Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 are neck-and-neck in the competition! Sigh!
ReplyDeleteSomething all of you guys seems to have overlooked. Both cameras are good and have their own strengths. But one other important thing is how's the after sales service. You should check out what's the service like in your country. Here in Malaysia, I find that Canon offers great after sales service compared. In fact whenever there's camera fair and promotion even Canon's promoters are more friendly and more helpful compared to Nikon. Recently I went to a Camera Fair in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, the people manning Nikon's booth not interested to talk to us. So we went to Canon's booth. Their promoters were so friendly and enthusiastic that my friend n I bought the 600D and 55-135mm lens. Now that's what I call good service
ReplyDeletethe t3i had much better image quality n that is the important thing in photography for most people..trust me
ReplyDeleteI am totally confused...initially I thought of buying Canon 60d(with 18-55 lens), then I decided to go for Canon 600d (with 75-200 lens)...and now am thinking of Nikon d5100(with 55-200 lens)...COMPLETELY CONFUSED I AM...please suggest (anyone, someone...plzzzzz)
ReplyDeleteIf you're buying a kit, go for Nikon. The 18-55 and 55-200 are great lens while the Canon ones aren't. If you buy a Canon kit, get the 18-135.
ReplyDeleteAnd the Nikon 18-200 is a great reason to buy any Nikon body.
Hi. Me I prefer Nikon5100D is more simple to use , and I bought Nikon 5100D and The Canon 600D too , but with the time I think Nikon 5100D is better !
ReplyDeleteThe Nikon appears to have time-lapse possibilities built in, whereas for the Canon you'd need to buy an accessory.
ReplyDeleteThe Nikon seems to have the time-lapse possibility built-in, whereas for the Canon it would be necessary to buy an accessory.
ReplyDeleteCanon cameras are much easier to use, the menu and button are very well thought and placed, and with such close comparison, this matters alone will define the utmost winner. Ask pro's what they prefer, and their answer is definitely which camera get out of their way the most and made their life easier.
ReplyDeleteto starters both cammera's have no autofocus build in it's in the lenses.
ReplyDeletesecondly on specs they are neck on neck.
if you have no prior experiance the menu is no isue becouse you'll have to rtfm (read the fucking manual) this is for both camera's.If you have experiance with one of the type surly one the known menu will have your liking.
the only points you need to take in account fot your choise is what do i want to do with this camera and what are theire constraints. Both are near prof. camera's so both are really good.have used both and both delliver outstanding foto's.
I finally took the D5100 because for me the picture made by the nikon have more depth and collor realism.
concerning the video function i'm of the oppinion that taking a video(don't know if i will ever need this) with the nikon is lees a hassel ,focussing all the time. And the canon video qualitty can only be better if your video object isn't moving to much or you lose the focus and then the quality is also lost due to manual focussing.
tacking a video with an slr I think is a nice gimick but should not be deffinitive to by a digital camera.for that reason the video camera is made.
classic!
DeleteI have a Sony A350 and if you look at amazon.co.uk, it got all 5 * reviews, I thought Canon may be a better brand and it is going to produce better pictures, I bought 600D a couple of days back. I am very disappointed with 600D as my 3-4 years old A350 produces much better picture under low light ( Inside house during winter season in UK) A350 produces more natural colours than 600D. Canons pictures looks like Oil paintings than water colour paintings. I am planning to return 600D to amazon. Low light performance is very bad noise levels are very high in 600d than A350.
ReplyDeletehy
ReplyDeletei was gonna buy 600d accepting its high price over nikon 5100.but some one told me 600d is putting patches on its images under sunlight in 100 ISO.can you help me regarding this issue. i am totally confused to purchase one of them.i have enough amount but i just want to buy one of them.over all i am entrusted for canon 600d.plz help me.
I'm so glad someone up there in that mess of comments mentioned the shutter sound. I own an older Nikon D80 and a fairly new Canon T3i. The shutter sound on the Canon T3i sounds like a toy (with a slight brief whirling tone). I don't like it AT ALL. The picture quality is similar - it's more the photographer than the camera when you compare such similar models. So, for me, the bottom line is my daughter will be getting a nice slightly used T3i from me and I'll be getting a new Nikon something-currently looking at the 7000 and the 5100-just not sure that I (being a very amateur photographer) will get the worth out of the 7000.
ReplyDeleteI to want to buy a new camera and I am torn on witch one to buy. After reading all these posts, I still don't know. I wear glasses and wonder if the view finder to look threw is better on one than the other?
ReplyDeletejust buy 600d, so amazing camera. Feels so mutch better than nikon...
ReplyDeleteIt's a good review. Perhaps you should look more thoroughly other aspects such as lenses or after-sales warranty, but with what I have read the Nikon 5100 is the best choice.
ReplyDeleteGo for t3i, better quality and colors up to 3.200 iso (99% time), better videos, better flash, better grip and buttons, dedicated iso button (d5100 not), best sharper lcd, cheaper lens, histogram (d5100 not), faster autofocus, etc., autofocus in body (d5100 not), best viewfinder, gridlines, wireless flash (d5100 not), and faster menues. D5100 pro: best pictures for >3.200 iso, effects, and noise video autofocus. So if you will take night pictures d5100, otherwise t3i. Sorry my english!
ReplyDeleteI am a Nikon User i already use The Nikon D5000 and the Nikon D7000. I've wanted the Canon 600D Because of the VIDEO Culpability and the Filters and i already tested this one in still, I like it also when using the tilty-swively Screen, But when the d5100 is been announce i think this is a good choice, i don't mind the button where are place, because the Nikon produce a great shot even on it's predecessor D5000 give you a Wonderful shot even in low light situation. secondly the Nikon is easily to remember because of the information graphics or whatever (For me i think..).. but in canon i shot in 600D and 60D the information is good but when i looking around on it i've been confuse to get it.in M mode.. (For me..)
ReplyDeleteBut overall I like the NIKON and CANON Camera. Because it give us a good and excellent Still Shot and Video..
-Jonerec..
Canon is better in advertising and marketing, Nikon is better in quality and feel specially in this price range! I had the T1i and T2i sold both and now bought the Nikon D5100 and let me tell you what a difference in quality and performance! the canon kit lens is just bad the Nikon is much better that's the real truth if you want nice pictures with a canon get prepare to shell off some money for a good lens! if you want the kit go with the Nikon also Nikon lenses are cheaper too....
ReplyDeletetaking a look at user submitted pics on Amazon.com it would appear that the Canon- even with the kit lens- takes a better picture overall. I also notice that Nikon users tend to overuse special effects such a selective color and miniture. Nikon d5100 takes a great pic no doubt, but to my eye the Canon edges it in image quality, macro, action, and even low light. The pictures really speak for themselves. Far more "wow' pictures from the Canon t3i than the Nikon D5100.
DeleteGo for Canon T3i 600D,Forget The Tension Forever.
ReplyDeletethose who first in hand use Canon/Nikon which they prefer the most, hand will tell u who is the first, if u say has a good grip or small you had used a Canon, if u say had a heavy grip and hard to hold you had used Nikon, those who say booth DSLR has a deferent capabilities and usage thats a pro photographer, first important things on photography is not what dslr's you use its about the story, moments and memories you had to it, pro photo artist knows about it, 2nd monkey can use DSLR...
ReplyDeleteCanon 600D is more expensive than nikon d5100 because it has the advantage of nikon d5100. I have seen all the pictures produced by the 600D and d5100. I honestly say, the picture of the 600D is more beautiful than d5100.
ReplyDelete